Workshop 4. Moving beyond the binaries of Nationalism Studies

Convenors: James Kennedy (University of Edinburgh) and Maarten Van Ginderachter (Antwerp University), in cooperation with ASEN Edinburgh.

Venue: Edinburgh University
25-26 May 2018 

The workshop will be held at The Project Room, 50 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LH.

This project is coordinated by the POHIS-Centre for political history of Antwerp University and funded by the ‘International Scientific Research’ program of the Research Foundation of Flanders.

Program text

Trump, Brexit and the rise of far right parties across Europe suggest the return of nationalism as an exclusive, populist and illiberal ideology. But not all nationalisms are similarly coloured. The secessionist nationalism of Scotland or Catalonia, for example, or the reformist nationalism of the Arab Spring suggest instances in which nationalism is more closely associated with liberalism and democracy. Arguably, of course, we only take notice when nationalism becomes ‘hot’, and its character very apparent.  At other times, its banal, everyday role as a source of personal and collective identification goes unnoticed, as does its character. These examples suggest perhaps that nationalism is labile or promiscuous, with no fixed essence, taking its character from dominant or emerging ideologies (John Hall).

One important point of reference is of course the clichéd dichotomy of civic vs. ethnic nationalism which was born in the particular historical circumstances following the Franco-German war and the ensuing conflict over Alsace-Lorraine in the 1870's. Its scholarly roots include Hans Kohn’s distinction between western and eastern nationalism. More recently, it has also been conflated with the distinction in normative political theory between liberal and illiberal nationalism made by Will Kymlicka among others. Clearly, binaries are omnipresent within Nationalism Studies, whether they be western/eastern, civic/ethnic, liberal/illiberal or left/right. In rethinking the utility of these classic binaries the conceptual stakes involved move beyond simple East/West or even North/South divides but implicate important issues such as liberalism, civil society and democratization.

Hans Kohn’s The Idea of Nationalism (1944) sought to understand the emergence of nationalism through the story of the development of Western civilization and of the rise of liberalism, and to contrast this process with its illiberal challengers. However, something of the ideological complexity of the European context was lost in this account. Kohn, perhaps for good biographical reasons, was too keen to offer an account of a rather neat linear development of Western civilization and the rise of liberalism. And yet, across Europe liberalism was rarely if ever pristine. It co-emerged with other contemporaneous ideological movements, republicanism in the 18th century and socialism in the 19th, and more generally, with older religious identities, dating perhaps to the medieval era, but more specifically to the reformation age and its popular mobilisations: religious understandings of the world have very often been implied in the national imagination.

The conflation of liberal with civic is particularly misleading in Kohn’s account, not least since the terms evoke distinct intellectual lineages: one liberalism and the other republicanism. Put bluntly, while liberalism makes no claim to universal truth, and is thereby tolerant of diverse opinions, republicanism, derived from the writings of Rousseau, among others, has a clear vision of the good life and is rather intolerant of competing views. To put this another way, and as John Hall (2003) suggests, civic nationalism is open ‘so long as one absorbs the culture of the dominant ethnic group’; this is quite different from liberal nationalism, which has at its core a ‘recognition of diversity’ limited only by a commitment to shared liberal values: groups cannot cage individuals. This leads Hall to usefully distinguish civil or liberal forms of nationalism from a civic republican manifestation of nationalism.

Of course, underlying both civil/liberal and civic/republican nationalisms is an ethnic attachment. Here it is worth remembering that ethnic identification need not be exclusive in a strong sense. As Thomas Eriksen reminds us, ethnic group membership can be open: religious conversion, intermarriage and linguistic integration are possible and need not be coercively underwritten. Şener Aktürk (2012) has recently sought to understand exactly this by offering ‘regimes of ethnicity’ as a way of foregrounding the role that ethnicity plays in conceptions of nationhood. His choice of cases is interesting since they relate precisely to those identified by Kohn as constituting ‘Eastern nationalism’: Germany, Russia and Turkey. Aktürk points to the ways in which ethnic difference is, or is not, supported by the state through ‘membership’, by granting or not granting citizenship to immigrants from diverse ethnic backgrounds; and through ‘expression’, that is, either encouraging or discouraging the legal and institutional expression of ethnic diversity. This usefully prioritises the place of ethnicity in conceptions of nationhood, but it unnecessarily obscures its political character in that civic nationalism is dismissed as a ‘vague, empty category’.

Starting from these reflections this workshop wants to move beyond the classic binaries of Nationalism Studies towards a more nuanced, reformulated framework that might provide a way to better understand nationalisms’ shifting guises.

We are particularly interested in papers oriented to the following sorts of questions:

  • To what extent are the classic binaries still workable? What happens if we relate them separately to the issues of national identity, citizenship law and nationalist ideology (Rogers Brubaker)? 
  • To what extent do distinctions supposedly made in 19th century European liberalism provide an intellectual foundation for these binaries? What about ‘historical’ vs. ‘non-historical’ nations? Where do Staatsnation, Kulturnation and Volksnation fit in?
  • How has the concept of ‘the West’ functioned as a push and pull factor in the history of nationalism? If ‘the West’ is gaining/losing appeal, how does this shape particular nationalisms? Similarly, how has the concept of the West, which has been charged with so many ideologies, been interpreted differently and over time by nationalists of diverse kinds?
  • Might liberal or ‘civil’ nationalism be distinguished from the often republican-orientated civic nationalism? What role does ethnicity play in these conceptions? And what secures liberal nationalism given the current fragility of liberal democracy? Which historical or contemporary cases shed light on this question?
  • How have specific nationalisms moved along the left-right dimension (both in cultural and economic terms) through history? The shifts between types of nationalism are of particular interest, from exclusive to inclusive national practices or vice versa. How are these shifts managed? In what historic contexts do they occur? And more generally, how is nationalism’s character shaped by the ideologies (feminism, Marxism, conservatism,…) it entwines with?

Presentations

Blackburn, Matthew (University of Glasgow), Characterising ‘Mainstream’ Nationalism in Contemporary Russia: The Challenges of Applying Nationalism Typologies

Cârstocea, Raul (Europa Universität Flensburg), Competing Nationalisms – Reading the History of Nationalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Between and Beyond the Binaries

Cetrà, Daniel and  Serrano, Ivan (University of Aberdeen - Open University of Catalonia), Majority Nationalist Responses to Self-Government Demands: A Framework for Analysis

Chervaux, Maxime (University Paris 8-Vincennes), Nationalism with a difference: asserting the impact of populism in the United States and in the European Union in 2018

Danielsson, Sarah K. (City University of New York, Queensborough), Pan-Nationalism Redefined: Reexamining Nationalism in its Historical and Current Forms

Duyster Borreda, Joana (University of Oxford), Catalanism between civic and ethnic nationalism. International models and influences on Catalan nationalism between 1880-1920

Gaber, Katrina (Gothenburg University), Researching Nationalism as Resistance: Providing Insights from the Perspective of the Researched

Kubicek, Paul (Oakland University), The Decoupling of Liberalism from Nationalism and the Illiberal Backlash Against Liberal Cosmopolitanism in Post-Communist Europe

Pogonyi, Szabolcs (Central European University), ‘Ethnic’ politics through ‘civic’ means: selective citizenship policies in Europe

Swerts, Kasper (University of Edinburgh), ‘N’oubliez jamais’: The Compulsion to Forget and the Shifting of Nationalisms in Quebec and Flanders

Schedule

Friday 25 May 2018

8.30-8.45

Registration, coffee and tea at The Project Room, 50 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LH

8.45-9.00

Introduction by James Kennedy (University of Edinburgh) and Maarten Van Ginderachter (Antwerp University)

Session 1 chaired by James Kennedy (University of Edinburgh) 

9.00-10.00

Keynote 1 by John A. Hall (McGill University)

10.00-10.45

Swerts, Kasper (University of Edinburgh), ‘N’oubliez jamais’: The Compulsion to Forget and the Shifting of Nationalisms in Quebec and Flanders

Discussant: Eric Storm (Leiden University)

 

 

10.45-11.10

Coffee break

 

 

11.10-11.55

Duyster Borreda, Joana (University of Oxford), Catalanism between civic and ethnic nationalism. International models and influences on Catalan nationalism between 1880-1920

Discussant: Eric Storm (Leiden University)

11.55-12.40

Cârstocea, Raul (Europa Universität Flensburg), Competing Nationalisms – Reading the History of Nationalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Between and Beyond the Binaries

Discussant: Peter Bugge (Aarhus University)

 

 

12.40-13.45

Lunch

 

 

Session 2 chaired by Maarten Van Ginderachter (Antwerp University)

13.45-14.45

Keynote 2 by Peter Bugge (Aarhus University), (De-)Constructing the dichotomy of Western and Eastern Nationalism

14.45-15.30

Blackburn, Matthew (University of Glasgow), Characterising ‘Mainstream’ Nationalism in Contemporary Russia: The Challenges of Applying Nationalism Typologies

Discussant: Jonathan Hearn (Edinburgh University)

15.30-16.15

Kubicek, Paul (Oakland University), The Decoupling of Liberalism from Nationalism and the Illiberal Backlash Against Liberal Cosmopolitanism in Post-Communist Europe

Discussant: John A. Hall (McGill University)

 

 

16.15-16.35

Coffee Break

 

 

16.35-17.10

Pogonyi, Szabolcs (Central European University), ‘Ethnic’ politics through ‘civic’ means: selective citizenship policies in Europe

Discussant: Jonathan Hearn (Edinburgh University)

17.10-17.55

Chervaux, Maxime (University Paris 8-Vincennes), Nationalism with a difference: asserting the impact of populism in the United States and in the European Union in 2018

Discussant: John A. Hall (McGill University)

 

 

17.55

Reception hosted by ASEN-Edinburgh

19.30

Conference dinner at Scotts Kitchen, 4-6 Victoria Terrace, Edinburgh EH1 2JL

Saturday 26 May 2018

9.00-9.30: coffee and tea

Session 3 chaired by Michael Rosie (University of Edinburgh)

9.30-10.15

Cetrà, Daniel and  Serrano, Ivan (University of Aberdeen - Open University of Catalonia), Majority Nationalist Responses to Self-Government Demands: A Framework for Analysis

Discussant: Dave Sinardet (Free University of Brussels)

10.15-11.00

Danielsson, Sarah K. (City University of New York, Queensborough), Pan-Nationalism Redefined: Reexamining Nationalism in its Historical and Current Forms

Discussant: Peter Bugge (Aarhus University)

 

 

11.00-11.20

Coffee Break

 

11.20-12.05

Gaber, Katrina (Gothenburg University), Researching Nationalism as Resistance: Providing Insights from the Perspective of the Researched

Discussant: Dave Sinardet (Free University of Brussels)

12.05-13.00

Closing discussion

13.00 Lunch, followed by a historic walk through Edinburgh.

Hotel information

Masson House, 18 Holyrood Park Road, Edinburgh

  1. Bugge
  2. Carstocea
  3. Danielson
  4. Gaber
  5. Hall
  6. Kubicek
  7. Pogonyi
  8. Serrano
  9. Sinardet
  10. Stynen

Salisbury Green Hotel, 18 Holyrood Park Road, Edinburgh

  1. Blackburn
  2. Chervaux
  3. de Mûelenaere
  4. Duyster
  5. Kennedy
  6. Storm
  7. Swerts
  8. Van Ginderachter

Workshop Participants

  1. Matthew Blackburn (University of Glasgow)
  2. Peter Bugge (Aarhus University)
  3. Ewen Cameron (Edinburgh University)
  4. Raul Cârstocea (Europa Universität Flensburg)
  5. Lorenzo Canepari (Edinburgh University)
  6. Daniel Cetrà, (University of Aberdeen)
  7. Maxime Chervaux (University Paris 8-Vincennes)
  8. Sarah K. Danielsson (City University of New York, Queensborough)
  9. Nel de Mûelenaere (Antwerp University)
  10. Joana Duyster Borreda (University of Oxford)
  11. Katrina Gaber (Gothenburg University)
  12. John A. Hall (McGill University)
  13. Jonathan Hearn (Edinburgh University)
  14. Ailsa Henderson (Edinburgh University)
  15. Justin Ho (Edinburgh University)
  16. Michael Keating (Centre of Constitutional Change/University of Aberdeen)
  17. James Kennedy (University of Edinburgh)
  18. Gezim Krasniqi (Edinburgh University)
  19. Paul Kubicek (Oakland University)
  20. Kristen Lahteine-Stepalavich (Edinburgh University)
  21. Nicola McEwen (Edinburgh University)
  22. Szabolcs Pogonyi (Central European University)
  23. Rogelio Regalado Mujica (Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico)
  24. Michael Rosie (Edinburgh University)
  25. Matthias Schanz (Edinburgh University)
  26. Ivan Serrano (Open University of Catalonia)
  27. Dave Sinardet (Free University of Brussels)
  28. Eric Storm (Leiden University)
  29. Andreas Stynen (NISE-Antwerp)
  30. Wilfried Swenden (Edinburgh University)
  31. Kasper Swerts (University of Edinburgh)
  32. Elise Tiers (Edinburgh University)
  33. Maarten Van Ginderachter (Antwerp University)
  34. Ziye Wang (Edinburgh University)
  35. Haiyan Wu (Edinburgh University)