Abraham, H., Lee, C., Brady, S., Fitzgerald, C., Mehler, B., Reimer, B., & Coughlin, J. F. (2017). Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: trust, preferences, and effects of age. Proceedings of the transportation research board 96th annual meeting (TRB'17).

Achterberg, P., De Koster, W., & Van der Waal, J. (2017). A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 704-720.

Aggarwal, P. K. (2021). Measure Right Every Time to Build Quality and Win Customer’s Trust. MAPAN, 36(3), 651-656.

Ahmad, S., Wasim, S., Irfan, S., Gogoi, S., Srivastava, A., & Farheen, Z. (2019). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research. population, 1, 2.

Al-Jabri, I. M., & Roztocki, N. (2015). Adoption of ERP systems: Does information transparency matter? Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 300-310.

Alessandro, M., Lagomarsino, B. C., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and trust in government. Evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 138, 105223.

Ali, S., Nawaz, M. A., Ghufran, M., Hussain, S. N., & Hussein Mohammed, A. S. (2021). GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: The contingent role of food technology neophobia. GM Crops & Food, 12(1), 170-191.

Anstead, N., & O'Loughlin, B. (2015). Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK general election. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 20(2), 204-220.

Bangerter, A., Krings, F., Mouton, A., Gilles, I., Green, E. G., & Clémence, A. (2012). Longitudinal investigation of public trust in institutions relative to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Switzerland. PLOS ONE, 7(11).

Beeckman, H. (2021). België test camera’s die je beboeten voor filmpje kijken of bellen achter het stuur. VRT NWS. voor-filmpje-kijken-of-belle/

Benleulmi, A. Z., & Blecker, T. (2017). Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars. Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 23.

Bilton, N. (2011). I Live in the Future & Here's How It Works: Why Your World, Work and Brain Are Being Creatively Disrupted. Currency.

Blind, P. K. (2007). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. 7th global forum on reinventing government building trust in government.

Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., Maddens, B., & Kampen, J. K. (2002). Identity vs Performance: An overview of theories explaining trust in government. Leuven, Belgium: Public Management Institute, Katholike Universiteit Leuven.

Broman Toft, M., Schuitema, G., & Thogersen, J. (2014). Responsible technology acceptance: Model development and application to consumer acceptance of Smart Grid technology. Appl. Energy, 134, 392-400.

Capon, A., Gillespie, J., Rolfe, M., & Smith, W. (2015). Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-13.

Chalmers, D., & Nicol, D. (2004). Commercialisation of biotechnology: public trust and research. International Journal of Biotechnology, 6(2-3), 116-133.

Chang, V., Baudier, P., Zhang, H., Xu, Q., Zhang, J., & Arami, M. (2020). How Blockchain can impact financial services–The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees. Technological forecasting and social change, 158, 120166.

Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 223-243.

Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR journal of humanities and social science, 19(4), 99-104.

Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public performance & management review, 28(4), 487-511.

Cobb, M., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395-405.

Connor, M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Factors influencing people’s acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust. Science Communication, 32(4), 514-538.

Coronavirus Covid-19. (2022).

Cruz-Cárdenas, J., Zabelina, E., Deyneka, O., Guadalupe-Lanas, J., & Velín-Fárez, M. (2019). Role of demographic factors, attitudes toward technology, and cultural values in the prediction of technology-based consumer behaviors: A study in developing and emerging countries. Technological forecasting and social change, 149, 119768.

Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American journal of political science, 48(1), 28-46.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Du, H., Zhu, G., & Zheng, J. (2021). Why travelers trust and accept self-driving cars: an empirical study. Travel behaviour and society, 22, 1-9.

Dujardin, D. (2021). Hogere boetes voor smartphone achter het stuur. De Tijd. achter-het-stuur/10353473.html

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719-734.

Engbersen, G., van Bochove, M., de Boom, J., Bussemaker, J., el Farisi, B., Krouwel, A., van Lindert, J., Rusinovic, K., Snel, E., van Heck, L., van der Veen, H. & van Wensveen, P. (2021). De laag- vertrouwensamenleving: de maatschappelijke impact van COVID-19 in Amsterdam, Den Haag, Rotterdam & Nederland, vijfde meting. Uitgever: Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences & Kenniswerkplaats Leefbare Wijken.

Europese Commissie. (2021). European citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards science and technology. Special Eurobarometer 516.

Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167-181.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research (Vol. 27). MA: Addison-Wesley

Garrett, P. M., Wang, Y.-W., White, J. P., Kashima, Y., Dennis, S., & Yang, C.-T. (2022). High Acceptance of COVID-19 Tracing Technologies in Taiwan: A Nationally Representative Survey Analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(6), 3323.

Garrett, P. M., White, J. P., Lewandowsky, S., Kashima, Y., Perfors, A., Little, D. R., Geard, N., Mitchell, L., Tomko, M., & Dennis, S. (2021). The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia. PLOS ONE, 16(1).

Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.

Gottweis, H. (2002). Gene therapy and the public: a matter of trust. Gene Therapy, 9(11), 667-669.

Gregory, P. A., & Austin, Z. (2021). Understanding the psychology of trust between patients and their community pharmacists. Canadian Pharmacists Journal/Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada, 154(2), 120-128.

Grondwet van België. (2021).

Gutteling, J., Hanssen, L., Van Der Veer, N., & Seydel, E. (2006). Trust in governance and the acceptance of genetically modified food in the Netherlands. Public Understanding of Science, 15(1), 103- 112.

HAA. (2020). Slimme camera’s speuren straks naar bellende bestuurders. HLN. bestuurders~a7bfdf0e/?

Hamet, P., & Tremblay, J. (2017). Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism, 69, S36-S40.

Han, J. H., & Harrison, R. W. (2007). Factors influencing urban consumers' acceptance of genetically modified foods. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29(4), 700-719.

Hasna, A. M. (2009). Contemporary society, technology and sustainability. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 5(1), 13-20.

Hewitt, C., Politis, I., Amanatidis, T., & Sarkar, A. (2019). Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: The autonomous vehicle acceptance model. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on intelligent user interfaces.

Ho, S. M., Ocasio-Velázquez, M., & Booth, C. (2017). Trust or consequences? Causal effects of perceived risk and subjective norms on cloud technology adoption. Computers & Security, 70, 581-595.

Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (2017). Trusting other people. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(1-2).Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of

social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759-777.

Huber, B., Wetzstein, I., & Aichberger, I. (2019). Societal problem solver or deficient discipline? The debate about social science in the online public sphere. Journal of Science Communication, 18(2), A04.

Huijts, N., Molin, E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1). 525-531.

Irani, T., Sinclair, J., & O’Malley, M. (2001). Whom do you trust? The influence of culture, gender and geography on consumer perceptions of GMO-labeled products. Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education.

Jimenez, P., & Iyer, G. S. (2016). Tax compliance in a social setting: The influence of social norms, trust in government, and perceived fairness on taxpayer compliance. Advances in accounting, 34, 17-26.

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 43(6), 740-755.

Kleizen, B., Van Dooren, W., & Verhoest, K. (forthcoming). Enhancing Trust in government AI projects. Experimental evidence.

Kritzinger, S., Foucault, M., Lachat, R., Partheymüller, J., Plescia, C., & Brouard, S. (2021). ‘Rally round the flag’: the COVID-19 crisis and trust in the national government. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1205-1231.

Kustermans, J., & Horemans, R. (2021). Four Conceptions of Authority in International Relations. International Organization, 1-25.

Lamote, S. (2021). Rechter moet zich uitspreken over Covid Safe Ticket. De Tijd covid-safe-ticket/10344401.html

Lang, J. T., & Hallman, W. K. (2005). Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(5), 1241-1252.

Lankton, N. K., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. (2015). Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(10), 1.

Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual review of political science, 3(1), 475-507.

Levi-Faur, D., Maman, L., Kariv-Teitelbaum, Medzini, Latusek, Verhoest, Six, Kleizen, Popelier, Glavina, Zimmeren, v., Maggetti, Schomaker, Fahy, Erp, v., & Grimmelikhuijsen. (2020). Trust in Governance and Regulation in Europe.

Lidskog, R. (1996). In science we trust? On the relation between scientific knowledge, risk consciousness and public trust. Acta sociologica, 39(1), 31-56.

Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.

Liu, K., & Tao, D. (2022). The roles of trust, personalization, loss of privacy, and anthropomorphism in public acceptance of smart healthcare services. Computers in Human Behavior, 127(C), 11.

Liu, P., Xu, Z., & Zhao, X. (2019,). Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 124, 354-369.

Luhmann, N. (1989). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion von Komplexität. Aufl., Stuttgart. Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of

Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395-405.

Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2017). What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 50, 55-64.

Maghari, B. M., & Ardekani, A. M. (2011). Genetically modified foods and social concerns. Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology, 3(3), 109.

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society, 14(1), 81-95.

Marien, K. (2022). De stad Antwerpen wil slimme camera's inzetten om dieselfraudeurs op te sporen: "Zij zorgen voor extra vervuiling". VRT NWS. stad-antwerpen-wil-slimme-camera-s-inzetten-om-dieselfraudeur/

Marques, M. D., Critchley, C. R., & Walshe, J. (2015). Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 601-618.

Marris, C. (2001). Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. EMBO reports, 2(7), 545-548. Master, Z., & Resnik, D. B. (2013). Hype and public trust in science. Science and engineering ethics, 19(2),

321-335.Mastroianni, A. C. (2008). Sustaining Public Trust: Falling Short in the Protection of Human Research

Participants. Hastings Center Report, 38(3), 8-9.

McMurray, J., Strudwick, G., Forchuk, C., Morse, A., Lachance, J., Baskaran, A., Allison, L., & Booth, R. (2017). The importance of trust in the adoption and use of intelligent assistive technology by older adults to support aging in place: scoping review protocol. JMIR research protocols, 6(11).

Mellouli, M., Bentahar, O., & Bidan, M. (2016). Trust and e‐government acceptance: The case of Tunisian on‐line tax filing. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 19(3), 197‐212.

Mendoza-Denton, R. (2011). What do we do when science contradicts itself? . when-science-contradicts-itself

Mereu, C. (2012). Schizophrenic stakes of GMO regulation in the European Union. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3(2), 202-211.

Merola, L. M., & Lum, C. (2014). Predicting public support for the use of license plate recognition technology by police. Police Practice and Research, 15(5), 373-388.

Merola, L. M., Lum, C., & Murphy, R. P. (2019). The impact of license plate recognition technology (LPR) on trust in law enforcement: A survey-experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(1), 55-66.

Meyer, S. B., & Ward, P. R. (2008). Do your patients trust you?: a sociological understanding of the implications of patient mistrust in healthcare professionals. Australasian Medical Journal (Online)(1), 1.

Ministerie van Financiën. (2001). Over de verhouding tussen overheid, marktwerking en privatisering. Een economische meta-analyse. METEOR, Maastricht University School of Business and Economics.

Miskelly, F. G. (2001). Assistive technology in elderly care. Age and ageing, 30(6), 455-458.

Monarkh, V. (2020). Gmo and health risks selected issues. Agriculture and forestry. 245-254.

Nadelson, L., Jorcyk, C., Yang, D., Jarratt Smith, M., Matson, S., Cornell, K., & Husting, V. (2014). I just don't trust them: the development and validation of an assessment instrument to measure trust in science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 114(2), 76-86.

Nah, F. F.-H., Tan, X., & Teh, S. H. (2004). An empirical investigation on end-users' acceptance of enterprise systems. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 17(3), 32-53.

Nam, C. S., Bahn, S., & Lee, R. (2013). Acceptance of assistive technology by special education teachers: A structural equation model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(5), 365-377.

Noguchi, P. (2003). Risks and benefits of gene therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(3), 193- 194.

O'Dwyer, L. M., & Bernauer, J. A. (2013). Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. SAGE publications.

Panagiotopoulos, I., & Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018). An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 95, 773- 784.

Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 27, 252- 263.

Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. sage.

Resnik, D. (2011). Scientific Research and the Public Trust. Science and engineering ethics, 17, 399-409.

Roberts, M. R., Reid, G., Schroeder, M., & Norris, S. P. (2013). Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 22(5), 624-641.

Rutberg, S., & Bouikidis, C. D. (2018). Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-213.

Schmelz, K. (2021). Enforcement may crowd out voluntary support for COVID-19 policies, especially where trust in government is weak and in a liberal society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1).

Schroeder, S. A., Zones, J. S., & Showstack, J. A. (1989). Academic medicine as a public trust. JAMA, 262(6), 803-812.

Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1994). Ethics of scientific research. Rowman & Littlefield.

Siau, K., & Wang, W. (2018). Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Cutter business technology journal, 31(2), 47-53.

Siegrist, M., Cousin, M.-E., Kastenholz, H., & Wiek, A. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49(2), 459-466.

Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk analysis, 20(5), 713-720.

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 125-143.

Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Trust, democracy and governance: Can government policies influence generalized trust? In Generating social capital (pp. 171-190). Springer.

Vaandrager, M. (2017). Gender differences in the evaluation of a risky technology (Master's thesis). Delft University of Technology. a0df-4114-aff1-d51c461ed1ea?collection=education

Van de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47- 64.

Van Den Hoof, T. (2022). Slimme camera telt verkeer op kruispunt met fietssnelweg in Zemst. VRT NWS.

van der Meer, T., Steenvoorden, E., & Quattara, E. (2020). COVID-19 en de rally rond de Nederlandse vlag. Corona Papers. nederlandse-vlag

van der Veer, L., van Sluis, A., Van de Walle, S., & Ringeling, A. (2014). Vertrouwen in de politie. Trends en verklaringen. Reed Business Information.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.

Verma, S., Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Kumar, S. (2018). An extension of the technology acceptance model in the big data analytics system implementation environment. Information Processing & Management, 54(5), 791-806.

Vias-Institute. (2020). Succesvolle test met camerasystemen om gsm-gebruik achter het stuur te detecteren. gsm-gebruik-achter-het-stuur-te-detecteren-/

Vlaanderen. (2021). Covid Safe Ticket (CST) als toegangsvoorwaarde.

Vraga, E., Myers, T., Kotcher, J., Beall, L., & Maibach, E. (2018). Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility. Royal Society open science, 5(2).

Walrave, M., Waeterloos, C., & Ponnet, K. (2022). Reasons for Nonuse, Discontinuation of Use, and Acceptance of Additional Functionalities of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 8(1).

Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2018). Determinants of trust in acceptance of medical assistive technologies. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health.

Willems, S. (2020). Succesvolle test met camerasysteem om gsm-gebruik achter het stuur te detecteren. gsm-gebruik-achter-het-stuur-te-detecteren-/

Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 95, 320-334.

Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 98, 207-220.

Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in human behavior, 26(4), 760-767.