Abstract
A well-known adage in law holds that judges only speak through their judgments. However, growing demands for transparency and public information by the judiciary challenge this principle, prompting a reconsideration of judicial communication at the crossroads of discretion and public information.
This research examines the evolving landscape of judicial communication in Belgium, addressing both legal and sociology of law dimensions. The study investigates who is authorized to communicate on behalf of (part of) the judiciary with the public, the legal status and role of press judges and communication attachés, and the legal framework governing this judicial communication. It also explores aspects of judicial communication in practice, analysing the actors, the way in which they operate, and their considerations and experiences.
Employing doctrinal and qualitative empirical methods, including interviews and ethnographic research, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of judicial communication. By integrating insights from legal analysis and sociology of law, the research advances academic debates on judicial communication, the legal profession, trust in and the legitimacy of the judiciary. Ultimately, this study seeks to inform legal recommendations to enhance judicial communication in Belgium.
Researcher(s)
Research team(s)
Project type(s)