The research line Human rights: A Common Responsibility explores to what extent international human rights law imposes, or is moving towards imposing obligations across and beyond State borders.
The research line focuses on two alternative ways of constructing a common responsibility for human rights:
Transnational human rights obligations
Human rights have traditionally been framed in a vertical perspective with the duties of States confined to their own citizens or residents. Obligations beyond this ‘territorial space’ have been viewed as either being nonexistent or minimalistic at best. This territorial paradigm has achieved particular prominence in political philosophy, but also in the interpretation of international human rights conventions, although there is language in many of these treaties that would provide a broader scope of application.
In this research line, we seek to reconceptualise international human rights law , in order to ensure that it can act effectively as a corrective to abuses of power and failures by a variety of actors that exercise power. From 2010 to 2015, the emphasis was on developing a general conceptual framework. This research was undertaken in the context of the European Research Networking Programme GLOTHRO , and resulted in several edited volumes with leading publishing houses (Cambridge, Routledge, SAGE, Brill). Since 2016, the general conceptual framework is being road-tested. As part of an international network, we will prepare a report on OECD states’ abidance with extraterritorial obligations. We also study how companies are or should become human rights duty-bearers.
The right to development
The Declaration on the Right to Development was adopted in 1986, but twenty-five years later the debate about the content and the distribution of the responsibility for the operationalisation of the right to development continues. The research group engages with efforts to implement and codify the right to development.