Research in the spotlight

Abstract

There is a growing societal and academic interest in, but a dearth of research on, universities as human rights duty-bearers. Universities may be directly and indirectly involved in human rights violations: directly through e.g. racist or sexist recruitment or promotion policies and practices or by employing staff in unfair or indecent labour conditions; or indirectly, due to human rights violations committed by their suppliers (merchandise licences; procurement) or by their partners (universities or others). During my sabbatical leave, I will look into two clusters of questions on universities as human rights duty-bearers: conceptualisation and operationalisation. The first cluster, conceptualisation, revolves around five core questions: 1. (how) can universities legally be constructed as human rights duty-bearers? 2. how can human rights obligations be assigned? 3. what is the scope of their human rights obligations? 4. when can they be held responsible for human rights violations – including the question of complicity? 5. how can they be held accountable for human rights violations? The second cluster, operationalisation, will focus on three human rights-sensitive areas in particular: 1. handling dissonance, disobedience and protest (on campus) 2. the university supply chain (cleaning; catering; construction) and university investment 3. inter-university (development) cooperation

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In recent years, there have been a number of court cases around allegations of businesses cooperating with armed groups in conflict situations. This has included collaboration in international crimes. In international law, it is possible to hold individuals responsible for their involvement in such actions. However, it is complicated to hold a business or armed group itself responsible and enforce legal consequences for corporate/group involvement in international crimes. This is inadequate, since such crimes often arise from the behaviour and policies of the whole organization, and individuals may also not be able to compensate victims. The legal situation is even more complex in situations where businesses and armed groups cooperate with each other, since it must be determined how the responsibility is shared between them. These questions have been researched very little, but as shown by the recent court cases, they are becoming important in practice to make sure that responsible organizations can be held accountable for international crimes. This project will therefore examine legal options to ensure the (shared) international responsibility and accountability of businesses and armed rebel groups where they cooperate in conflict situations in acts that amount to international crimes.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Co-promoter: Casalin Deborah

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Twenty-five years after its introduction by the Treaty of Amsterdam, judicial cooperation in civil matters remains a remarkable and fascinating field of law. It is developed through a continuously increasing set of new and/or updated legislative instruments, subject to the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). It finds itself at the crossroads of the EU law and private international law, and actually transforms private international law into an instrument to achieve the EU objective of an area of freedom, security and justice. While this particular nature has lent a particular force to civil judicial cooperation as an instrument to develop judicial cooperation between EU partners, based on mutual trust, it also explains why many students and practitioners consider it a particularly complicated legal field, which requires a combined knowledge of EU law and private international law, and hence of public law and private law. The very swift evolution of this field, as illustrated by more than 20 major EU instruments that have been adopted since the entering into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, adds to the need for knowledge and practical skills in this field. Against this background, PAX 3.0 project wishes to further develop the innovative educational tools developed by the consortium in previous projects: a unique moot court competition in the area of civil justice, combined with awareness raising activities on selected EU regulations in the area of civil cooperation in judicial matters.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Pertegas Marta
• Co-promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Meeusen Johan
• Co-promoter: Rutten Stefan

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In June 2023, the European Union (EU) introduced the EU Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR) with the aim to reduce the EU's contribution to global deforestation and forest degradation by securing 'deforestation-free supply chains' of seven commodities being imported from outside the EU or exported to third countries. Operators and traders were given 18 months to implement the regulation, with its requirements entering into force on 30 December 2024. Hence, in the forthcoming years, all actors involved in its implementation will have to grasp and address the complex interactions within global value chains and the related socio-legal dynamics, leaving considerable space for interpretation, adaptation and redefinition. The research project contributes in a unique and timely manner to the fields of business and human rights and critical legal studies on commodity chains. It does so by researching and connecting jurisdictions at two extremes of the coffee and soy value chains, and enriching the traditional legal approach with the empirical analysis of how telecoupling dynamics materialise in these chains that link Brazil and Belgium. In particular, the project will collect new and currently unavailable knowledge on: a) the implementation of the EUDR in Belgium; b) the resulting changes in socio-legal territorial dynamics in Brazil; and c) on the opening (or not) of new legal spaces for corporate intra-value chain accountability.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Fellow: Reid Ysaline

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Ten years ago, the world saw that finance had permeated every aspect of the global economy. Back then, it was clear that financial interests could not build a better and different world. Ten years later, the COP24 has legitimised a vision of sustainability and climate change mitigation and adaptation where sustainability rhymes with profitability. Financial actors are increasingly finding large returns by investing in the transition to "greener" infrastructure, including the not-so-green Chinese green belt and road and dams like the Belo Monte, a project that originally applied for carbon credits and was labelled as a sustainable investment. Similarly, they can make money out of interests paid by cities that try to reduce their environmental impact, adapt to climate change and implement more sustainable solutions. Green bonds represent one of the main tools used to channel resources from finance into the green transition, but they have not been sufficiently discussed or understood from the point of view of law and socio-ecological justice. If money is the driver, we should not expect private investors to have any interest in projects that won't generate a sufficient return, to support people or cities that cannot pay for the service or for the debt, or to protect poor and vulnerable people from climate change. The project critically engages with green bonds and with the assumption that climate change should be fought according to the rules of Wall Street, i.e. that people and the planet should be supported only on the basis of whether money can be generated or not.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Fellow: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) – implemented in South Africa, Indonesia, Vietnam and Senegal - are being hailed as novel platforms for supporting developing countries accelerate transitions to low-carbon and climate-resilient economies while addressing socio-economic transition risks. Despite limited study of their efficacy, donors have pledged almost USD29 billion to deliver climate finance through JETPs to meet decarbonisation and climate-resilience targets. This project will be the first global systematic analysis of the plans, processes and practices in all four JETP countries with the broader objective of understanding whether these multi-donor partnerships can serve as models of financing global climate transitions. The research examines: (1) the JETP model and investment plans' effectiveness in meeting multi-dimensional challenges of financing 'just transitions'; and (2) their suitability as platforms for scaling up climate ambitions in developing countries in the context of their intersections with countries' existing domestic and international legal, policy and regulatory frameworks. This research is part of an ongoing academic and civil society collaboration under the auspices of the Climate Finance for Equitable Transitions (CLIFT).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

International law has remained within a state-centric paradigm even with the radical shifts in the global arena over the last half century, including the consistent rise of hybrid actors that simultaneously embody a public and a private character or public and private attributes. These hybrid actors are emblematic of the sustainable development and international law nexus. This project seeks to address the influence of hybrid actors on international law.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Fellow: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The intersection between domestic laws and EU law for children moving across borders within the EU is extremely complex and increasingly common. Judges apply EU instruments to matters such as parental responsibility, maintenance or succession but these instruments do not cover whether a parental bond exists (in law). This is left to domestic law (Private International Law – PIL included). This situation may create obstacles to the exercise of free movement rights of children and their families and infringe/undermine human rights. It was recently acknowledged that an action to support the recognition of parenthood between Member States was necessary: in fact, the European Commission recently presented the Parenthood Proposal COM(2022)695. However, until the new regulation is adopted, the effective and coherent application of the EU acquisis at times dependent on the operation of domestic law including PIL. The UniPAR project aims at improving the effective and coherent application of the EU Acquis by (1) identifying parenthood issues arising in connection to existing EU secondary law, also analyzing the possible impact of the Parenthood Regulation at the EU level;(2) analysing how parenthood is dealt with in the (PIL) domestic law in six jurisdictions, also on the basis of sample cases;(3) discussing the issues with stakeholders, through a dedicated international workshop in Brussels and six national seminars;(4) developing Conclusions and Recommendations. The Final Conclusions and Recommendations will be presented at an International Final Conference and published in an Open Access book. UniPAR also includes a robust dissemination strategy. The UniPAR Consortium includes researchers from Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Italy, Poland and Spain that bring in expertise in the area of parentage, domestic and EU Private international law, EU law and Human Rights. Target group: Judges, Lawyers, Notaries, Civil Servants, Law and Policy Makers, Academics, Civil Society.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Meeusen Johan
• Co-promoter: Swennen Frederik
• Co-promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This action is designed to contribute to Enabel's Cooperation Portfolio Palestine - Empowered Youth in Green Palestine – Specific Objective 2 "Youth Protection and Civic Engagement". The project consists of an academic collaboration between University of Antwerp (UA) and Birzeit University (BZU). It aims at realizing a series of activities oriented at researching and understanding how Palestinian youth relate to their rights. In particular, how they perceive that they are protected against repression and violence, how they engage in their communities and participate in decision making, which rights they aspire to achieve and which rights they consider cannot be achieved in the ongoing colonial context.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals hail multistakeholder partnerships (MSPs) as key actors in achieving sustainable development. MSPs that bring together states, businesses, philanthropy and civil society are increasingly in the frontlines of providing public goods that are human rights such as food, health, education and water. In these domains, partnerships are spearheading the continued expansion of multistakeholder governance into international law, including human rights law. This expansion has been taking place without critical appraisal with respect to its effectiveness and consequences. GENESIS breaks new ground by exploring the normative and operational implications of this shift, both at the system-level and at the level of specific global partnering initiatives and individual multistakeholder partnerships. GENESIS investigates the interface of international law and multistakeholder governance in the realisation of human rights. It analyses how the paradigms of multilateralism and multistakeholderism diverge or converge as they simultaneously govern the domains of food, health, education and water through human rights law and multistakeholder partnerships, respectively. GENESIS has three main objectives that will generate high research and policy gains. First, GENESIS will uncover and understand how norms that govern human rights through multistakeholder partnerships are made in the post-2015 era in the governance of food (SDG 2), health (SDG 3), education (SDG 4) and water (SDG 6). Second, GENESIS will investigate how multistakeholder partnerships impact the way human rights are operationalised. Third, GENESIS will identify pathways to an effective uptake of human rights legal standards by multistakeholder partnerships. In doing so, GENESIS will derive insights on whether and how international law and multistakeholder governance can generate common ground when governing public goods that are human rights.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Recently we have witnessed important scientific developments in artificial (or assisted) reproductive technologies (ART). At the same time, there have been social and cultural evolutions in thinking about same-sex marriage and families. Laws on child-parent relations in various countries have not changed at the same pace and not in the same direction, due to the difficulties to integrate new phenomena in the longstanding traditions of national family laws. Belgium and Switzerland have regulated ART but not surrogacy, and have taken legislative steps to protect children's right to know their origins. Other countries consider several ART practices contrary to public policy (Germany, France and Italy). Some have regulated child-parent relations emanating from ART (The Netherlands and the United Kingdom); some are or have been destinations of "reproductive" tourism (Spain and Greece). Others are reluctant to recognise same-sex parenthood (Croatia and Poland). This is resulting in extraordinary diversity and even political tension. JUST BONDING will analyse the different laws, as well as how legal systems accept or refuse to accept parent-child relationships established in other countries. Project partners will study how principle of the best interests of the child and other fundamental rights influence the establishment, recognition and contestation of child-parent relations. They will identify appropriate conditions for legal recognition of these new forms of parenthood.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Kruger Thalia

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The introduction of new genomic technologies (NGT) in the EU has recently been supported by the presentation of a legislative proposal by the European Commission. In the area of food systems, it appears evident that they are considered to be a key pillar for the future, with the Commission, EU parties and some areas of the private sector presenting this technological step as the solution to most problems (productivity, adaptation to climate change, resilience, hunger, etc.). However, this rapid evolution has often outpaced the regulatory structures in place, creating gaps, ambiguities, and uncertainties that must be understood and addressed to ensure ethical and equitable use (or non-use). As the normalization of these technologies seem to be irreversible, it becomes therefore critical to generate a deep understanding of the way in which the regulatory frameworks have been changing and of the way in which law and regulations are considering the internalization of possible negative externalities, what questions are asked and how different legal frameworks are deployed to engaged with NGTs, their adaptation and their governance. However, this outcome transcends the boundaries of the present project, its length and budget.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

While large scale development projects in various sectors such as transport, energy and urban development may result in a number of benefits to the wider public, involuntary and arbitrary displacements that may result from such projects remains to be the most significant adverse impacts of development projects that potentially affect the enjoyment of human rights by the people (in)directly affected by development projects. And noting that large scale development projects usually involve multiple actors ranging from host country's government entities, financiers, project developers and international investors among others, there is need to analyze the duties of each of the actors towards the project affected persons. Apart from host States which bear primary responsibility for protection of its people against displacement, tracing responsibility for human rights violations against the affected communities arising from such projects in a web of actors is usually complicated task thus often leaving such violations unaddressed. The research seeks to analyze the role of Development Finance Institutions in preventing or mitigating impacts of displacements caused or likely to be caused by their financed projects in the Global South. The project uses select countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and European Development Financing Institutions as case studies.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Fellow: Sego Janet

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The role of an international human rights (IHR) court is to assess whether a state has breached its human rights obligations. While evidence is at the heart of adjudication, evidence in IHR adjudication has never been studied in a systematic and comprehensive way. The EU-funded DISSECT project will address this gap and clarify the 'messy' IHR evidentiary regime with benefit for the scholarly community and practitioners. It will identify 'best' and 'worst' practices and generate specific recommendations for use in IHR adjudication. Moreover, it will develop new insights and create a new strand in critical legal studies. DISSECT is needed by those seeking international redress without knowing exactly what evidence is required of them as well as by IHR adjudicatory bodies at risk of losing their legitimacy.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Casalin Deborah
• Co-promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project seeks to scrutinise the role of human rights law and particularly the principle of equality and non- discrimination in addressing socio-economic inequality. While the principle of equality and non-discrimination is an obvious entry-point to discuss forms of inequality, it has been side-lined as a way to address socio-economic inequality. The principle has been widely reduced to non-discrimination, leaving out a broader notion of equality that, going beyond the prohibition of discrimination, requires structural change to promote substantive equality. Being so, the equality dimension of the principle is underdeveloped in its content, lacking a precise definition and scope. It is argued that equality can be developed to address socio-economic inequality if given a precise content. This exercise faces, however, challenges in determining and attending to the boundaries of law when it comes to structural social change, keeping in mind the separation of powers. As such, it is pointed out that the problem of socio-economic inequality pushes human rights law to its boundaries, which, up to this point, have not been properly defined. In the context of the equality and non-discrimination principle, research is needed to clarify the role of human rights law in addressing socio-economic inequality beyond the prohibition of discrimination, and so in a positive, transformative, or structural way.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Vanneste Frédéric
• Fellow: Marcondes Smith Michael

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Tanzania has one of the world's highest child marriage prevalence rates. Child marriage, which impacts girls and young women disproportionately, is a gendered issue that various frameworks such as international human rights law as well as the Sustainable Development Goals aim to tackle. While legal approaches have focus mostly on prohibition, successful prevention of child marriage requires addressing root causes and principal risk factors and bolstering and building on people's capacities and resources. Existing risk factors for child marriage that mainly include socioeconomic factors such as poverty, lack of educational opportunities for girls and alternatives to build livelihoods are expected to be compounded by environmental risks caused by climate change such as droughts or floods. The Re-Empower project builds on empirical findings of and the human rights-based approach espoused in a previous collaborative project on the health impacts of child marriages in Tanzania and aims to build resilience among girls and young women and their social environs by empowering them by leveraging the positive impact of customs and traditions.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Co-promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

As compared to other areas of law, climate change law is relatively novel and not well defined yet. Its hard core aims at the regulation of climate change mitigation and adaptation. It has a considerable overlap with energy law, as a mitigation policy cannot be without an energy transition. Furthermore, legal scholars specialized in a wide range of areas are increasingly exploring how climate change and its socio-economic impacts relate to their area of expertise. This wider circle of climate change-related expertise is booming. Prominent examples include the nexus between climate change and human rights and the nexus between climate change and biodiversity protection. The only criterion to label this diverse legal research and expertise as climate change law is a functional one: whatever serves the legal handling of new issues raised by climate change 'is' climate change law. A recent phenomenon in climate change law is the development of national climate change litigation as a transnational governance mechanism: national court judges influence one another from country to country, co-creating case-law regarding shared legal issues. The SRN rides this dynamic wave of legal innovation and evolutions.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Globalized trade depends on the possibilities for companies, people and countries to be connect with each other and constantly exchange goods. In 2019, 811 million Tons Equivalent Units of containers were handled in ports worldwide. This represented a global growth of 2 per cent compared to the previous year, confirming the expansionist trend of the last two decades. Container ports are essential knots of the global economy and have been the object of academic studies from different perspectives (global value chain management, technological innovation, business development, tax law). What is often forgotten, is that container ports not only forge global connections, but also local and material connections with urban spaces, sites of production, land use, air quality, workers' lives, etc. Moving from shore to land, this proposal departs from existing legal literature on container ports as global actors and casts light on container ports as local-global socio-legal constructions with a significant local and global impact. Through a combination of desk-based research and the empirical study of five of the largest ports in the world (Shanghai, Antwerp, Buenaventura, Tanger and Los Angeles), the research will generate a unique qualitative and quantitative understanding of the ports as complex socio-legal spaces whose governance structure, regulatory frameworks, sustainability commitments and political processes may have significant implications on multiple localities.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) act as interlocutors and catalyzers to foster the private sector growth in developing countries through the use of bilateral development assistance to finance their projects. DFIs may be fully or partially state-owned and are often themselves set up as private sector companies in their countries of origin. Multiple DFIs operate in the same developing country settings, often deploying different governance norms. They also conclude different private contractual arrangements in financing the private sector. Although they have broad reach with respect to the sectors that they finance, which include manufacturing and infrastructure but also health care, education, agricultural production, they do not always have mechanisms to keep track of their impacts on people, planet and prosperity. This research project seeks to understand how different DFIs factor in accountability around people, planet and prosperity in their work and identify shortcomings based on real life experiences on the ground. It also aims to make a normative contribution to international law scholarship by evaluating whether and how international law can accommodate obligations incumbent upon hybrid public-private actors and their responsibility under international law.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Fellow: Sego Janet

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

There is a renewed interest in extreme socio-economic inequality. On the one hand, it is acknowledged that extreme socio-economic inequality is economically and socially harmful. On the other hand, there is an acute awareness that climate change measures, and sustainable development more generally, necessitate a renewed debate on socio-economic distribution. Some have argued that the economy of the future must be distributive by design. Human rights law may make a distinctive contribution to socio-economic distribution, but has not shown as much interest in socio-economic inequality as in status inequality, and may also not be optimally equipped for that task. This project seeks to future-proof human rights law by making it not only redistributive, but also more predistributive by design. In particular, it will focus on strengthening the equality principle in human rights law.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Fellow: Marcondes Smith Michael

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

As part of the International Humanitarian Law (IHL) In Focus project, the Geneva Academy will publish an Annual Report providing an overview and analysis on select issues related to compliance with IHL in 22 priority conflict situations. The Annual Report covers the period between 1 July 2023 and 30 June 2024. The ultimate objective is to provide States, IOs, NGOs, academics with tools of IHL analysis that are independent, impartial and conducted according to the highest academic standards, and which can support IHL advocacy and humanitarian diplomacy with a view to increase respect for IHL. The specific objective of the consultancy is to conduct high quality substantive review of entries addressing the state of IHL in selected fragile and conflict affected states to feed into the Annual Report as per defined methodology.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Drafting of two fact sheets / legal analysis guidance notes for the International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in Focus Project, on: 1) the treatment of persons in IHL and; 2) the conduct of hostilities in IHL. The notes respectively cover the sub-themes of: 1) conflict-related displacement, conflict-related sexual violence, and torture/cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment; 2) critical infrastructure, "soft targets" and the natural environment. For each sub-theme, the following is provided: a summary of the relevant law; a list of relevant treaty provisions and/or references related to the customary nature of the relevant rules; a list of guiding questions to inform legal analysis; a list of key legal documents and doctrine; and a summary of the most prominent related legal controversies / points for attention.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The compound effect between food inflation and skyrocketing energy markets has been disastrous for the European population. Especially for the groups already at the margins. According to a Joint Research Council study of December 2022, "rising living costs between August 2021 and August 2022 have increased material and social deprivation by around 2 percentage points at the EU level and up to 6 percentage points in selected Member States. The corresponding effects on absolute monetary poverty are considerably larger, and amount to 4.4 percentage points on average and up to 19 percentage points at the national level." Inevitably, high inflation and high food prices have rapidly contributed to the intensification of already existing conditions of food poverty and insecurity, but also added hundreds of thousands of new people to the group of food insecure across the continent. At this time of crisis, some large corporations within our food system that trade, process, and produce food – similar to corporations in the energy sector – have recorded record profits and disbursed large payouts to their shareholders. Exceptionally large profits in a time of crisis have been met with accusations of greed and profiteering. At the same time, higher food prices paid by producers have not materialised in the same increase in profits earned by farmers as higher costs of production have eradicated large parts of the gains made in revenues. This raises the question who benefits from the current crisis, and which structures are enabling these players to benefit. The answer lies in a combination of market concentration, power, and corporate strategy as well as an increasing interconnectedness between food and financial systems that characterises our current food system. This report demonstrates that high profits in times of crisis are not an exceptional or isolated incidence or a consequence of the actions of a few 'misbehaving' or 'unethical' large corporations, but a symptom of a highly dysfunctional and vulnerable food system on which we rely. While the weaknesses of our food system tend to receive political attention only during times of high prices, we argue that policy makers must move away from the focus on external shocks – such as the Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine – and focus on the structures that produce and reproduce these vulnerabilities to shocks and the internal fallacies of the global food system, in order to understand the current as well as past food price crises.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals hail multistakeholder partnerships (MSPs) askey actors in achieving sustainable development. MSPs that bring together states, businesses, philanthropy and civil society are increasingly in the frontlines of providing public goods that are human rights such as food, health, education and water. In thesedomains, partnerships are spearheading the continued expansion of multistakeholder governance into international law, includinghuman rights law. This expansion has been taking place without critical appraisal with respect to its effectiveness andconsequences.GENESIS breaks new ground by exploring the normative and operational implications of this shift, both at the systemleveland at the level of specific global partnering initiatives and individual multistakeholder partnerships. GENESIS investigates theinterface of nternational law and multistakeholder governance in the realisation of human rights. It analyses how the paradigms ofmultilateralism and multistakeholderism diverge or converge as they simultaneously govern the domains of food, health, educationand water through human rights law and multistakeholder partnerships, respectively.GENESIS has three main objectives that will generate high research and policy gains. First, GENESIS will uncover and understand how norms that govern human rights through multistakeholder partnerships are made in the post-2015 era in the governance of food(SDG 2), health (SDG 3), education (SDG 4) and water (SDG 6). Second, GENESIS will investigate how multistakeholderpartnerships impact the way human rights are operationalised. Third, GENESIS will identify pathways to an effective uptake of human rights legal standards by multistakeholder partnerships. In doing so, GENESIS will derive insights on whether and how internationallaw and multistakeholder governance can generate common ground when governing public goods that are human rights.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

PAX 2.0 combines a number of educational and training activities to ensure a better understanding ans application of the main legal instruments in the area of civil justice. The project therefore intends to combine the components of the earlier JUDGTRUST and PAX projects that have proven their worth -i.e. the moot court and partnership with the judiciary- with two new elements: a particular focus put on the further extension of the moot court to student teams from third countries and the development of a guide on the organization of moot courts on EU private international law that would make the expertise gained in our earlier projects available to the Commission through a practical manual. Ideally, this manual would be made freely accessible online. A further important element of PAX 2.0, which is also in line with JUDGTRUST and PAX, is that the moot courts and judicial training will focus on topical issues of EU private international law, which should ensure improved knowledge of those legislative instruments that are new and/or raise new legal questions. In short, this proposal seeks to ensure that the proposed consortium further develops and expands students', academics' and trainee judges' knowledge on major recent developments of EU private international law, through moot courts and judicial trainings respectively. It is therefore meant to improve the effective and coherent application of the legislative instruments of judicial cooperation in civil matters. Moreover, it envisages the consolidation of the moot courts as an attractive educational tool in that respect, both for EU and non-EU law students interested in EU private international law.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Pertegas Marta
• Co-promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Meeusen Johan
• Co-promoter: Rutten Stefan

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

- Support of GLAN internal team in the Development and implementation of a holistic legal strategy for the specific case of Barbuda. - Support of GLAN internal team in the identification of an 'evidence collection' strategy and the best way to move it forward. - Support of GLAN internal team in the definition and initiation of litigation at the national level (Antigua and Barbuda) and – possibly – at the transnational level outside of Antigua and Barbuda. - Provision of legal inputs to the International campaign and legal advocacy strategy - Provision of contacts and networks for the development of a transnational legal actions against similar developments in the Caribbean. Kick-off of the conversation with other possible partners for GLAN.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

There is an acknowledgement in law and development studies that institutions, including law, matter for development. There is 'a massive surge in development assistance for institutional reform projects'. Lawyers, 'who often conceive of themselves as institutional designers', hence become important actors in development (Trebilcock and Mota Prado 2014: 27-31). However, lawyers have often been given a rather technical training, and are often not able to understand and oversee the broader implications of legal engineering for questions of sustainable development and global justice. The ITP Sustainable Development and Global Justice (SUSTJUSTICE) aims to offer a comprehensive teaching programme based on the research lines of the University of Antwerp Law and Development Research Group (LDRG). It responds to the demonstrated interest and need of participants from the South in comprehensive and focused training on the role of law in pursuing sustainable development and global justice in a development context.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

International law has remained within a state-centric paradigm even with the radical shifts in the global arena over the last half century, including the consistent rise of hybrid actors that simultaneously embody a public and a private character or public and private attributes. These hybrid actors are emblematic of the sustainable development and international law nexus. This project seeks to address the influence of hybrid actors on international law.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Fellow: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Advice on a human rights based approach to the envisaged cooperation agreement between Belgium and Palestine (2022-2026), entitled 'Empowerd Youth in a Green Economy", particulaly in the areas of sexual and reproductive health rights, gender-base violence, shrinking space for civil society organisations, capacity enhancement of rights holders and duty bearers. Includes a proposal on future academic cooperation on the human rights based approach to development.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Human rights are increasingly described as in crisis. One reason for this is that current accountability mechanisms cannot adequately deal with intricate and multilayered human rights violations that occur in rapidly changing and vastly complex social contexts. Thus, if human rights are to continue to offer a widely accepted framework for thinking about (social) justice, we urgently need to reconstruct the very notion of accountability on which it is pinned, so that better protection is offered. This project revisits the questions of what counts as a human rights violation, who holds human rights duties and how to actually deliver human rights accountability, in the context of pressing and complex challenges. Harnessing the legal, sociological, anthropological and criminological expertise of the consortium's members, it finds resources and strategies for thicker human rights accountability within human rights law, from other domains of law, and beyond the legal realm. The identification of a variety of avenues for achieving better human rights protection will provide the basis for a thicker conceptualization of the notion of (human rights) accountability.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In the 2020 Farm to Fork strategy, the European Commission recognises that the current EU food system is characterized by significant economic, social and environmental externalities. In particular, small-scale farmers and SMEs receive a very limited percentage of the value generated, nature is degraded and consumers have no access to healthy food. In the last years, alternative, short and fair food chains have been proposed as a solution to the social and environmental weaknesses of the conventional food system. However, academic research has showed that these business models often face significant struggles: they often rely on volunteer work; they can hardly scale up; they tend to cater a small group of wealthy consumers. Our project recognizes the need to bring together academic and non-academic expertise to go beyond these bottlenecks and support the establishment of financially, socially and environmentally resilient North-North food chains. With the support of two post-doc researchers hired 50%, the work of two internationally known non-governmental organizations operating in the area of fair and ethical trade (Fair Trade Advocacy Office and World Fair Trade European Union) and four privileged Belgian stakeholders (Flanders' Food, Fairtrade Belgium, The trade for development centre and Belgium Fair Trade Federation), we analyse and assess the potential and limits of existing alternative, sustainable and fair European short-food chains. During the two years, we us stakeholders meetings, desk-based research and qualitative analyses to valorise existing solutions, identify new ones and offer guidance both on how to integrate local, sustainable and fair food into larger food chains and on how to scale up while being financially resilient, fair, sustainable and accessible. In the long-term, the project sets the bases for a research/action international consortium to be consolidated through the two years of the project and the drafting of at least one proposal for a large European grant (Horizon Europe) or a larger SBO IOF grant.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Context: The conversion of natural ecosystems for agricultural land use and minerals' extraction is one of the main drivers of global biodiversity loss. At the same time, deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics is the second largest source of global greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions. Despite the scientific evidence about agriculture and mining as major threats to biodiversity and the global climate, the frontiers of global value chains continue to be expanded into tropical forests, causing deforestation, forest degradation and biodiversity loss.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Co-promoter: Kolinjivadi Vijay Krishnan
• Co-promoter: Van Hecken Gert

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Describe how BIO operates today and explain how today's structure, strategic mandate, governance, risk management policy and accountability mechanisms differ from those that were in place in 2012 when the DBTFP report was issued; Mapping the projects funded by BIO in the areas of agriculture and climate, Assessing BIO's farming and climate strategy in general and in the specific context of the two case studies that will be selected; Formulating recommendations and indications of possible interventions.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Co-promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

I propose to conduct unique, multidisciplinary research to the content, scope, and construction of the Chinese version of sustainability, by focusing on the experience of the legal and institutional framework produced by 'Ecological Civilisation' (EC). It fits into the traditions of Law & Society and Law in Context. EC has been promoted in the last years by the Chinese government as a new and alternative way of looking at the relationship between nature and humanity in the context of the Paris Agreement on climate change. China as an ecological civiliser will project attitudes towards the states, society, and species, and eventually create laws, institutions, and social realities that fit these attitudes. I will focus on the legal dimension of EC in ordinary life and empirically unfold the struggles and contradictions that accompany its installation. To achieve this goal, I will conduct fieldwork in Jiangsu Province, observing trials and interviewing people. Based on this survey, I will identify (1) the holistic and hierarchical view regarding the State, society, and nature, (2) the de facto mechanism of multicentric governance, and (3) the urgent need of adapting national laws to local realities. This research will apply methods inspired by Law in Context and Bourdieu's sociology, with the support of the multidisciplinary approach of Law Faculty and the IOB at the UAntwerp.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Fellow: Zhu Mingzhe

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project creates the institutional framework among seven research institutions to further consolidate the international Moot Court Competition on EU private international law and to further strenghthen judicial training in this area of the law. The project hopes to achieve the following objectives: - Consolidation, further improvement and expansion of a pan-European and international Moot Court Competition on EU private international law; - Increased awareness of EU private international law among students, legal professionals and academics; - Increased knowledge of students and junior legal professionals (judges trainees in particular) in EU private international law; - Opportunities for students and junior legal professionals (judges trainees in particular) to gain practical experience with the application of EU private international law; - Increased knowledge of EU private international law; - More efficiency and consistency in the interpretation and application of EU private international law, both within the EU and beyond; - Coordinated teaching, mutual learning, colloboration and enlarged networks for those concerned with the correct and consistent application of EU private international law instruments.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Pertegas Marta
• Co-promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Meeusen Johan
• Co-promoter: Rutten Stefan

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Intercountry adoptions in Flanders do not always happen correctly. The Flemish government established an expert panel in July 2019 in order to scrutinize intercountry adoptions in the past. The panel has been asked to issue recommendations to ensure that intercountry adoptions in the future will be conducted properly.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Swennen Frederik

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

There is an acknowledgement in law and development studies that institutions, including law, matter for development. There is 'a massive surge in development assistance for institutional reform projects'. Lawyers, 'who often conceive of themselves as institutional designers', hence become important actors in development (Trebilcock and Mota Prado 2014: 27-31). However, lawyers have often been given a rather technical training, and are often not able to understand and oversee the broader implications of legal engineering for questions of sustainable development and global justice. The ITP Sustainable Development and Global Justice (SUSTJUSTICE) aims to offer a comprehensive teaching programme based on the research lines of the University of Antwerp Law and Development Research Group (LDRG). It responds to the demonstrated interest and need of participants from the South in comprehensive and focused training on the role of law in pursuing sustainable development and global justice in a development context.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze
• Co-promoter: Lizarazo Rodriguez Liliana

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project will conduct a national baseline assessment on the current state of implementation of the United Natiions Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in Belgium in order to inform the formulation and prioritisation of actions for the second Belgian National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. The NBA exercise will cover all three pillars of the UNGPs, and the 33 guiding principles underpinning the NAP (GP).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Lizarazo Rodriguez Liliana

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Human rights have traditionally been framed in a vertical perspective (state-individual), with the duties of states confined to individuals on their territory. Obligations beyond this 'territorial space' have been viewed as either non-existent or at best, minimalistic. This territorial paradigm is seriously challenged nowadays. The Scientific Research Network seeks to achieve the following three scientific targets with specific focus on state practice: 1. SYSTEMATIZE To take stock of progress made over the last decade, since the adoption in 2011 of the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, in applying the principles, and propose ways forward; we have identified five thematic clusters in which extraterritorial human rights obligations have become most pertinent: development cooperation; environment; investment, finance and trade; migration; and peace and security, and along which the WOG will be organized. Legal developments on these five thematic clusters will be studied from the perspective of four human rights governance systems: the United Nations and the three regional human rights governance systems (the African Union; the Council of Europe; and the Organization of American States). 2. DEEPEN To take stock of conceptual progress and propose ways forward, drawing on the work undertaken in the framework of GLOTHRO, a European Research Networking Programme on extraterritorial human rights obligations (2010-2015). There are two key doctrinal puzzles that need to be examined: the jurisdictional hooks to assign extraterritorial obligations to states, and the question which principles may guide the distribution of obligations among states (and responsibility for violations). 3. BROADEN To ensure cross-pollination with other disciplines and civil society work in the area of extraterritorial obligations: on the one hand, we want to learn empirically from civil society work through concrete cases they are involved in or aware of, including through strategic litigation, and to deepen the interdisciplinary dialogue on ETOs. On the other hand, we want to share with civil society and other disciplines our thematic and conceptual findings (see scientific targets 1. and 2.) in order to have them tested and refined. Through multidisciplinary co-creation of knowledge, we want to expand the knowledge base on ETOs.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project aims at reducing child marriage rates and its associated health challenges in Tanzania by using a human rights based approach (HRBA) with a 3-tier capacity-building approach. The first tier is capacity-building for the staff of Mzumbe University (MU) Faculty of Law (FOL) to engage in empirical socio-legal research to better understand dynamics in relation to the health challenges associated with child marriages in Tanzania. The empirical findings gathered by FOL, MU will set the ground for the second tier of the project. The findings will be used to design a training programme based on a HRBA to train social workers in the selected Dodoma region and other regions through a mobile application. In the third tier, the mobile application will be developed and used to equip social workers to become translators of international human rights standards by applying a HRBA in their interventions to deal with health challenges associated with child marriages which will contribute to the reduction of child marriages and its associated health challenges.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

For the Greater Caribbean states - especially Small Island Developing States (SIDS) - climate change is re-shaping the relationship between land and people. Recent storms have wiped out the entire sugar cane production of Cuba, banana plantations in Jamaica, St Lucia and Dominica, and decimated nutmeg exports from Grenada, while the decrease in rainfall has in some cases destroyed entire food crops. Furthermore, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) - a grouping of twenty countries in the region - states that over 90% of its food is imported, which makes them vulnerable to sudden economic, political, and environmental shocks, wherein their food supplies can be suspended for indeterminable periods of time, making this region food insecure. The partnership explores community-based food systems land natural resources management by bringing together academics, communities and stakeholders from five countries of the Greater Caribbean. The aim is to enhance existing research, contribute to the co-production and exchange of knowledge, and contribute to the identification of bottom-up community-led practices as the most effective ways of addressing the interconnected challenges of food insecurity and climate change in the region.This is an urgent initiative. Climate change is shaping anew the everyday lives of current and future generations, both locally and globally, for land and natural processes upon which its productivity depends are being degraded. For people in the Caribbean region - especially in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) –vulnerability to the effects of climate change is particularly significant: extreme weather, biodiversity loss, unpredictable/low productivity of agricultural lands, limited access to land, safe water and increased dependency upon trade to meet food needs further compound the effects of poverty. Yet, their voices, experiences, histories, knowledge and approaches to climate change and food (in)security are often excluded from academic and political considerations. The countries we will work with have a range of community based practice we will learn from and enhance the role of this knowledge in local policy making. The project is structured around a partnership between academics and community organizations based in Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, Colombia, Jamaica and Puerto Rico. They are the McChesney George Secondary School in Antigua and Barbuda; the Library of African and Indigenous Studies in Belize; the Raizal Youth Organisation in the Archipelago de San Andres, Colombia; the Bernard Lodge Farmer's Association in Jamaica; the Fidecomiso of the Caño Martín Peña Community Land Trust in Puerto Rico. All the partners lead agricultural, legal, cultural and educational projects that focus around climate change, food and land use with strong community participation. All the project partners have already worked with at least one of the applicants on issues closely connected with this proposal and have established strong relationships with them. Yet, with the exception to the partners in Barbuda and Puerto Rico, the other partners have never had the chance to meet and establish a dialogue.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Sustainable and just food systems can combat climate change, regenerate ecosystems and provide affordable nutrients, decent jobs, and educated consumers. However, the EU agri-food sector and the global supply chains that feed EU consumers are characterized by an unequal distribution of value among actors and serious environmental externalities. In the EU and elsewhere, small-scale farmers and SMEs often earn too little while players upstream fight on price to gain market-shares and defeat competitors. Farmers struggle to earn a living and are unable to engage in environmentally sustainable practices. The role of price competition and competitive attitudes in undermining sustainability is especially visible in EU chains like grain, vegetables and fruits, as well as in tropical fruit supply chains (cocoa, banana and coffee) that are crucial for SMEs and link millions of small-scale farmers with EU consumers. A range of technological and organizational innovations have been attempted to address socio-environmental unsustainability, but they rarely had a significant impact because of their silos approach and the reproduction of the dynamics of cheap food and price competition. In addition, solutions often come up against the legal barriers posed by competition law, which works to prevent sharing of information on pricing and other forms of cooperation, with no legal support. A more systematic and collaborative approach to sustainable, safe and just food supply chains is required, a fact that is increasingly recognized among EC policy makers calling for "new ways of doing science, research and innovation that put the food system at the centre." This imperative underlies the ambition of CISV (Collaborative Innovations for Sustainable Competitiveness), the objectives of which are to co-construct, pilot and assess a combination of cooperative legal, organization and technological innovations to promote sustainability-oriented competitiveness in agri-food chains.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Ten years ago, the world saw that finance had permeated every aspect of the global economy. Back then, it was clear that financial interests could not build a better and different world. Ten years later, the COP24 has legitimised a vision of sustainability and climate change mitigation and adaptation where sustainability rhymes with profitability. Financial actors are increasingly finding large returns by investing in the transition to "greener" infrastructure, including the not-so-green Chinese green belt and road and dams like the Belo Monte, a project that originally applied for carbon credits and was labelled as a sustainable investment. Similarly, they can make money out of interests paid by cities that try to reduce their environmental impact, adapt to climate change and implement more sustainable solutions. Green bonds represent one of the main tools used to channel resources from finance into the green transition, but they have not been sufficiently discussed or understood from the point of view of law and socio-ecological justice. If money is the driver, we should not expect private investors to have any interest in projects that won't generate a sufficient return, to support people or cities that cannot pay for the service or for the debt, or to protect poor and vulnerable people from climate change. The project critically engages with green bonds and with the assumption that climate change should be fought according to the rules of Wall Street, i.e. that people and the planet should be supported only on the basis of whether money can be generated or not.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Fellow: Ferrando Tomaso

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The Institute of Development Policy of the University of Antwerp is seeking to fill a full-time (100%) vacancy for a Doctoral Grant by the University Research Fund (BOF) in the area of 'Green City Bonds to finance climate change adaptation and mitigation: a comparative analysis of legal processes, development paradigms and socio-environmental implications'. Your research is situated in the IOB research field of Development Processes, Actors and Policies and is connected with the Law and Development Research Group at the Faculty of Law. More specifically, your research focus matches the research line "environment and sustainable development" but also engages with questions of contractual and regulatory dynamics pertaining to the interaction between city councils, financial investors and citizenship at the time of climate emergency. Your research focuses on a comparative, power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of the way in which (at least) three main cities in the world use or plan to use the Green City Bonds to finance their climate change adaptation and mitigation plans. Specific attention will be paid to the legislative, contractual and regulatory frameworks that cities enact in order to have access to the funds, and the implications that Green City Bonds have in terms of identification of adaptation and mitigation priorities, democratic participation, cities' indebtedness and the transformation of the pre-existing regulatory and governance framework.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Ferrando Tomaso
• Fellow: Herrera Héctor

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The relationship between law and development continues to be a key issue of debate both in academia and policy circles. The concept of Law and Development is not one-dimensional and has been closely linked with the reality of poverty and unsatisfied basic needs. Although this field focused initially on the economic dimension, as development was mostly seen as a consequence of (if not synonymous to) economic growth, the human and cultural dimensions of development are currently also a central part of the legal analysis. The concept of sustainable development and the rights-based approach to development are now part of the core content of the law and development field. Sustainable Development is a complex concept, which refers to the following topics: environmental protection, respect for socio-cultural contexts, empowerment of the poor, and inter-generational and intra-generational justice (Blewitt 2008:4). Sustainable Development is also connected with global justice because its core concern is the poor and the negative impact of globalization on the poor, including intertemporal impacts (Blewitt 2008:5; Cullet 2010:357; see also Pahuja 2011, 2013). The ITP Sustainable Development & Human Rights Law provides key conceptual and analytical tools to gain in depth knowledge of and critically assess the interplay between law and development. The module offers high quality teaching and learning in a dynamic environment, paying attention to South-North as well as the South-South interactions. In this respect, development is not conceived in unidirectional terms (from North to South) but as a process characterised by complex social, political and economic interactions across the globe where Southern actors play and ought to play roles as important as Northern ones. Key themes explored include not only human rights implementation and development cooperation but also standard-setting on human rights and sustainable development for the future. The ITP purports to overcome the lack of critical reflection on what human rights and sustainable development mean in a development cooperation context and further enrich legal thinking with interdisciplinary insights. At the same time, it offers hands-on training to turn analysis into practice.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The Project analyses the application of the Brussels I Recast Regulation and is set to provide recommendations on how to achieve a greater consistency in the international civil procedure instruments of the EU to enhance legal certainty, predictability and access to justice in cross border legal transactions. Global legislative developments will also be considered.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Pertegas Marta
• Co-promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Meeusen Johan
• Co-promoter: Rutten Stefan

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

A study on behalf of ENABEL mapping the field of human rights actors in the Occupied Territorities, with a view to policy recommendations on the mainstreaming of human rights in the Belgian development cooperation with Palestine, in particular with regard to the use of information technology in human rights projects.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

According to children's rights law, as a subsection of human rights law, the best interests of the individual child must be a paramount consideration in all matters involving a child. According to private international law, when a parent wrongfully takes a child from one country to another, the general approach to the best interests of the child is that that child must be speedily taken back (unless exceptional circumstances can be proved). The individual versus general approach to the best interests of the child has caused debate among scholars and confusion among judges and civil servants. The question arises how these two international legal frameworks (in particular the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction) interact and should interact with each other. This question is not limited to the issue of international child abduction. The difficult interaction, sometimes even conflict, between international legal regimes is a known problem. It can be addressed by seeking a hierarchy between the legal regimes, i.e. that human rights law must prevail over other areas of law or that human rights law must be seen as supportive rather than dominant. However, the hypothesis of this research is that reconciliation should be sought rather than hierarchy. The research envisaged by BECAREFUL will focus on seeking such reconciliation in the issue area of international child abduction. The researcher will investigate case law of two supranational courts, representing the different fields of law (the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU) as well as national courts of six countries. The investigation will seek to establish how these courts combine the strict return rules of the Hague Convention with the best interests of the individual child as formulated by the Children's Rights Convention. This will be done through content analysis with the aid of NVIVO software. The outcome of the research will be used to draw conclusions not only for the issue area but also for the bigger debate of the interaction between international legal frameworks.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Kruger Thalia
• Co-promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Fellow: Van Hof Tine

Research team(s)

• Personal Rights and Property Rights
• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The research seeks to explore the human rights accountability implications of mobilizing private actors in the post-2015 development era by inspecting multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSPs) in education. Private actors are increasingly infused into global policy-making and implementation as a proposed panacea to governance gaps through hybrid public-private engagements. In this vein, being formalized and supported under the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals, MSPs have now become ubiquitous in the governance of sustainable development. While MSPs manage substantial financial resources and operate in ways that affect the lives of a great number of people, they lack a clear legal status, mandate and duties under international law, giving rise to accountability challenges. In domains that are both public goods and human rights such as education the involvement of private actors has previously paved the way for the commercialization and corporate capture of agendas, exacerbating accountability challenges. This research seeks to overcome the paucity of critical legal reflection seeking to evaluate and address the human rights accountability challenges posed by the policy-driven mobilization of private actors in MSPs in achieving public objectives such as the delivery of quality education. To this end, the project will employ empirical research methods using quantitative and qualitative analysis as well as key informant interviews.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Fellow: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

For the Belgian Francqui Chair, the Francqui Foundation invites every year Belgian or European scholars to stay with Belgian universities, in order to organize a teaching program and to participate in the academic life of the institution. In this way, the Francqui Foundation encourages exchanges between Belgian and European universities. The Master of Laws program (LL.M) at the Faculty of Law of the University of Antwerp proposed Dr Margot E. Salomon as a holder of this year's Belgian (European) Francqui Chair. Dr Salomon is an established scholar with an international reputation. She has published in leading journals (e.g. European Law Journal, Human Rights Quarterly) and at leading publishing houses (Oxford University Press). Her multidisciplinary research covers the broad domain of global economic justice. She examines with a critical eye the contribution and limitations of law in the context of economic globalization.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The main framework for this project are the United Nations Guiding Principles (UNGP) on Business and Human Rights, particularly the second pillar regarding how human rights duties are integrated into the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). More specifically, this project considers the framework provided by the National Action Plan (NAP) recently approved in Belgium, provided that the toolbox is the first action point of this NAP. The toolbox will be designed for corporations (and their partners) and other organisations with activities in the jurisdiction of Belgium. The toolbox will provide complete, schematic and clear information regarding human rights duties of non-state actors (corporations and other organisations) in the framework of their activities, but also how they can comply with these duties, and if any human rights violation is caused, how they can provide for remedies or redress to the victims. Some of the tools to be included are: a. Human Rights Due Diligence and related human rights impact assessment within the organisation but also in relation to their partners (belonging to the global value chain). b. A system of operational complaints to be provided by non-state actors when an abuse has been caused, in order to offer effective redress or just compensation to victims. c. A check-list on human rights compliance.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Lizarazo Rodriguez Liliana

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The relationship between law and development continues to be a key issue of debate both in academia and policy circles. The concept of Law and Development is not one-dimensional and has been closely linked with the reality of poverty and unsatisfied basic needs. Although this field focused initially on the economic dimension, as development was mostly seen as a consequence of (if not synonymous to) economic growth, the human and cultural dimensions of development are currently also a central part of the legal analysis. The concept of sustainable development and the rights-based approach to development are now part of the core content of the law and development field. Sustainable Development is a complex concept, which refers to the following topics: environmental protection, respect for socio-cultural contexts, empowerment of the poor, and inter-generational and intra-generational justice (Blewitt 2008:4). Sustainable Development is also connected with global justice because its core concern is the poor and the negative impact of globalization on the poor, including intertemporal impacts (Blewitt 2008:5; Cullet 2010:357; see also Pahuja 2011, 2013). The ITP Sustainable Development & Human Rights Law provides key conceptual and analytical tools to gain in depth knowledge of and critically assess the interplay between law and development. The module offers high quality teaching and learning in a dynamic environment, paying attention to South-North as well as the South-South interactions. In this respect, development is not conceived in unidirectional terms (from North to South) but as a process characterised by complex social, political and economic interactions across the globe where Southern actors play and ought to play roles as important as Northern ones. Key themes explored include not only human rights implementation and development cooperation but also standard-setting on human rights and sustainable development for the future. The ITP purports to overcome the lack of critical reflection on what human rights and sustainable development mean in a development cooperation context and further enrich legal thinking with interdisciplinary insights. At the same time, it offers hands-on training to turn analysis into practice.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Sustainable development in no-growth economies: socio-economic human rights revisited (SUSTRIGHTS) - No-growth, be it cyclical (resulting from financial and/or economic crises) or structural (related to sustainable development), necessitates a paradigmatic shift in the understanding of socio-economic human rights and in the role assigned to human rights in development (cooperation). This project researches how to factor in the consequences of no-growth economics in the conceptual analysis of socio-economic human rights, both in the context of a domestic legal order and in global development (cooperation).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project is part of the researcher's doctoral work, titled 'The role of international (quasi-judicial) mechanisms in ensuring reparation for arbitrary displacement'. This part of the project consists of fieldwork to carry out the empirical part of the doctoral research. This will take place in a local context of forced displacement which has been examined by an international court. Concretely, the fieldwork will consist of interviews with claimants in the case and their representatives, other displaced persons in the context in a comparable situation, and local NGOs, judges and officials working on the issue of forced displacement. The aim is to provide insight into the effect of the chosen decision on the rights user, measured in terms of the user's perception – in particular, whether and how the international decision facilitated them in realizing their rights (or those of others) on the local level. Due attention will be paid to links with the broader social picture of national reparations processes, social mobilization and/or structural causes of displacement. Ultimately, interviews would aim to identify contextual elements (e.g. social, political, etc.) contributing to the impacts identified. On the basis of the totality of the interviews, some more general, initial insights will then be drawn out as to how these elements may be taken into account by international (quasi-)judicial mechanisms and other actors to ensure/maximize positive effects (e.g. safe return, effective restitution/compensation) in future situations. The empirical case study method will be adopted, in particular through the use of qualitative, semi-structured interviews with a relatively defined target group in a specific context (i.e. the context of a specific international (quasi-)judicial decision on reparations for arbitrary displacement). In order to shed light on the perspective of rights-users, the target group of the interviews – categorized according to the users' perspective methodology - will be: 1) Rights claimants - i.e. people directly involved in the international claim as plaintiffs, or people in a comparable position who could be affected by the decision - and/or their representatives (e.g. lawyers, NGO representatives); 2) Rights realizers (i.e. parties in a position to help claimants realize their rights, e.g. local officials) 3) Sympathizers (e.g. representatives of NGOs supportive of the claimants and active on related issues) 4) National judges

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Casalin Deborah

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

A preliminary desk study identifying links to human rights in documents preparing the new country strategy of the Belgian development cooperation with regard to Palestine, with a particular emphasis on mainstraiming the right to education.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The research aims at answering the central research question whether a right to reasonable accommodation of religion and belief should be recognized in the Flemish educational context. This question will be guided by two sub-questions. 1. Which principles can constitute the normative basis of the legal concept of reasonable accommodation of religious diversity in educational institutions? 2. Which difficulties may reasonable accommodation of religious diversity pose in the educational setting and how can they be addressed?

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Cuypers Daniël
• Fellow: Benfquih Yousra

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This was a proposal to develop an in-depth study on the impact of EU human rights conditionalities on countries in the Western Balkans that aspire to EU membership. The proposal was to analyse both EU human rights conditionalities in general, and the response of selected countries through case studies. The proposal failed to attract EU funding.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Fellow: Qerimi Qerim

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The project looks into state-based judicial mechanisms and state-based non-judicial grievance mechanisms with regard to human rights violations by business, with special emphasis on the barriers to access to remedy measures. It consists of three parts. First, a mapping is undertaken of the procedural and material aspects of available judicial and non-judicial mechanisms in Belgium. Second, a flyer will be designed which will include the main findings of the first part. This flyer will be accessible to all stakeholders (affected persons or groups, enterprises, NGOs, trade unions, etc.) and will provide clear, quick and concrete information concerning (i) the state mechanisms at the three levels that can be used to obtain remedy or to enforce rights affected by business activities; (ii) the duties of the stakeholders; and (iii) the available mechanisms for their enforcement and compliance. And third, recommendations will be formulated on legal and political measures to remove actual or potential barriers to the access to remedy. The third part will therefore map obstacles (limitations or gaps at different levels such as legal, financial, administrative or procedural difficulties) related to each of the mechanisms mapped in the first part and that may obstruct or complicate the effective use of these ways of remedy.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The ITP Sustainable Development and Human Rights Law (SUSTLAW) aims to offer a comprehensive teaching programme based on the research lines of the University of Antwerp Law and Development Research Group. The ITP SUSTLAW examines what the potential and limits are of the law in realising human rights and sustainable development in a globalized world. It does so by providing key conceptual and analytical tools to gain in depth knowledge of and critically assess the interplay between law and development. The ITP aims to contribute to a level playing field in the North/South debates on global legal reform in the area of sustainable development and human rights. Increasingly, global debates focus on human rights and sustainable development as two key principles underpinning any development cooperation. Against this background, the ITP is designed to give participants the necessary background and tools in critically appraising the two principles of human rights and sustainable development in legal and policy-oriented debates as well as to assess attitudes to sustainable development and human rights in different geographical contexts. The ITP also envisages the development of writing, presentation and argument skills of the participants to assist them in their career development. In addition, the programme is expected to equip participants from the Global South with the requisite knowledge on political and legal processes underpinning policy in the area of sustainable development for turning the commitment of Northern 'development partners' into reality. This will be achieved not only through interactive teaching but also through networking opportunities with experts from the North, both researchers and practitioners in the field.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Desmet Ellen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The project aims to analyse the causes and circumstances that explain the systematic violation of the rights to water and prior consultation of indigenous peoples in the Peruvian Amazon, as well as local resistance strategies. More concretely, the project attempts to comprehend the following issues: (i) the production and functioning of the concepts of habitat and water, as they relate to indigenous peoples, the state and economy; (ii) the ways the consultation processes conducted eventually contribute to uphold the State's hierarchy of rights, in which state and corporate rights are considered superior to indigenous rights, thus mimicking the social hierarchy; and (iii) the resistance and defence strategies adopted by indigenous peoples, e.g. by using human rights language (localisation).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Co-promoter: Desmet Ellen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In principle, human rights law does not impose obligations directly upon private actors, such as transnational corporations (TNCs). States are obliged, though, to protect their citizens against violations by TNCs. They should thus adopt legislative or other measures regulating the activities of TNCs in accordance with human rights standards. Consequently, TNCs are indirectly bound by human rights norms, via domestic legislation. Many developing countries, however, do not appropriately regulate the activities of TNCs in order to maintain an attractive investment climate in pursuance of their development policies. The research project will analyze whether the obligation of developing countries to protect can be enforced through litigation, backed up by a political strategy or not. Can judges directly require or indirectly provoke the strengthening or enforcement of regulations in accordance with human rights standards? At the fundamental level, this might be inhibited by the principle of separation of powers (forbidding the judiciary from interfering with the executive or legislature) and the normative position of human rights within the hierarchy of legal norms. At the practical level, it is should be assessed whether litigation is considered appropriate by victims and whether and under what circumstances it is likely to be successful. For this purpose, a case study will be conducted on health problems caused by resource extraction in South Africa and Nigeria.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Fellow: Verdonck Lieselot

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand VLIR. UA provides VLIR research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Vandeginste Stef

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Since the ILO recommendation on the Social Protection Floor 2012, social protection is again higher on the international agenda. Financing for social protection will have to be primarily generated at the national level. Nonetheless, and for sure in the poorest countries, international support will be necessary in order to offer social protection to all. This project seeks to 1. map current and proposed mechanismss for international financing of social protection; 2. enrich the discussion; and 3. influence the position of the joint campaign on social protection. This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand the client. UA provides the client research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In June 2011, the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council 'endorsed' the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). The UNGPs have attracted considerable academic interest, yet research has tended to travel along distinct tracks addressing the topic from either a human rights law or management perspective. The purpose of this Network is to promote collaboration between scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds to identify and examine the conceptual, practical and normative issues that arise in the application and concretization of the UNGPs. The focus of the network will be on bringing insights from law and management together to build upon the UNGPs, to facilitate common understandings of concepts and to ensure that the concepts are readily applicable in both the law and management context. The network will promote the exchange of ideas, sharing of information and collaboration on business and human rights in four different research domains: international public and private law, management, philosophy/business ethics, corporate governance. The aim is to foster mutual understandings, identify knowledge gaps, spur innovative research in these areas and further devise conceptual anchors on which future interdisciplinary academic research can built. This is a fundamental research project financed by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). The project was subsidized after selection by the FWO-expert panel.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand Erasmus Mundus. UA provides Erasmus Mundus research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The conception of nation States as the sole subjects of international law has been strongly shaken by challenges brought about by globalization. The emergence of non-State economic actors (NSEAs) such as transnational corporations or international financial institutions (IFIs) with de facto economic and political power is a reality that needs to be reckoned with, both politically and legally. Recent years have seen an ever-growing academic interest in illuminating the human rights obligations of these actors and an upsurge of international initiatives aiming to regulate their behaviour. Even more recent is the recognition that children and their rights should be given special consideration, as is evidenced by the 2012 Children's Rights and Business Principles and the 2013 General Comment 16 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child. Yet existing frameworks fall painfully short of responding to challenges and resolving pressing issues about the children's rights obligations of NSEAs to accord the necessary level of human rights protection to children everywhere. As such, many children are left without the much-needed shelter of human rights law and find themselves in situations detrimental to their wellbeing and best interests. The research project seeks uncover in what ways can the responsibility for children's rights that befalls upon nation States be complemented or shared by the responsibility of NSEAs and to develop principles applicable to the different array of NSEAs for the attribution and apportioning of this responsibility.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Fellow: Erdem Türkelli Gamze

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The research aims at answering the central research question whether a right to reasonable accommodation of religion and belief should be recognized in the Flemish educational context. This question will be guided by two sub-questions. 1. Which principles can constitute the normative basis of the legal concept of reasonable accommodation of religious diversity in educational institutions? 2. Which difficulties may reasonable accommodation of religious diversity pose in the educational setting and how can they be addressed?

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Cuypers Daniël
• Fellow: Benfquih Yousra

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between Unesco and on the other hand VLIR. UA provides Unesco research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand VLIR. UA provides VLIR research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Vandeginste Stef

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In principle, human rights law does not impose obligations directly upon private actors, such as transnational corporations (TNCs). States are obliged, though, to protect their citizens against violations by TNCs. They should thus adopt legislative or other measures regulating the activities of TNCs in accordance with human rights standards. Consequently, TNCs are indirectly bound by human rights norms, via domestic legislation. Many developing countries, however, do not appropriately regulate the activities of TNCs in order to maintain an attractive investment climate in pursuance of their development policies. The research project will analyze whether the obligation of developing countries to protect can be enforced through litigation, backed up by a political strategy or not. Can judges directly require or indirectly provoke the strengthening or enforcement of regulations in accordance with human rights standards? At the fundamental level, this might be inhibited by the principle of separation of powers (forbidding the judiciary from interfering with the executive or legislature) and the normative position of human rights within the hierarchy of legal norms. At the practical level, it is should be assessed whether litigation is considered appropriate by victims and whether and under what circumstances it is likely to be successful. For this purpose, a case study will be conducted on health problems caused by resource extraction in South Africa and Nigeria.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Fellow: Verdonck Lieselot

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The project will survey the reasons and practices of recruiting children in armed conflicts today, providing a map of the relevant countries, identifying the worst perpetrators and offering a definition of 'child soldier'.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Starting point of the research project is the finding that both rights holders and duty bearers under human rights norms are confronted simultaneously with a multitude of human rights provisions differing as to their scope, focus, legal force and level of governance. This non-hierarchical accumulation of human rights provisions has resulted in a complex and unco-ordinated legal architecture that may in some circumstances create obstacles for effective human rights protection. The central research objective of the proposed network is the study of human rights law as an integrated whole from a users' perspective.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project maps out the state-of-the-art of human rights-based approaches to development in theory and practice. It pays particular attention to gender and children's rights. Furthermore, it explores the application of a rights-based approach within the four UNESCO domains (education, communication, culture and science).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

iImplementation of the project "International interdisciplinary course: children's rights in a globalized world: from principles to practice". Expansion and deepening of globalisation results in the challenges of poverty, environmental degradation, child soldiering, child labour and migration assuming a new dimension. These developments challenge the concept of chldren's rights and ask for critical reflection on the role of children's rights as leverage for societal change.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The proposed research aims at conducting an in-depth legal analysis of the technique of power-sharing which is increasingly being called upon by peace negotiators and included in peace accords that put an end to (internal) armed conflicts. The research will, first of all, study the legal qualification of power-sharing ¿ as a component of the wider peace accord ¿ under international law. In addition, the incorporation of the political agreement on power-sharing into the national (in particular constitutional) law of the countries concerned will be thoroughly analyzed. Finally, the proposed research will conduct a scientific analysis of the powersharing agreements from a human rights perspective.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Co-promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Fellow: Vandeginste Stef

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Power-sharing has increasingly been used as a component of peace agreements. The project aims at scientifically analyzing the use of power-sharing from a human rights perspective. An empirical and a normative perspective will be combined, i.a. for the analysis of selected African case studies. The project is innovative and contributes to ongoing international academic research and policy debate on how to promote the rule of law after violent conflict.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Human rights violations occur daily, all over the world. Sovereign States legally bear the primary responsibility for human rights violations. But what happens when these States are not able to live up to their human rights obligations? Do other States have extraterritorial obligations to help them out? Which role should other actors (companies, international organisations) play? This Programme starts from the assumption that human rights obligations, in particular also in the field of economic, social and cultural rights, need to be re-thought in the present era of globalisation. The displacement of the state and the increased power and impact of corporations and international organisations, pose major practical and conceptual challenges to human rights law. In practice, human rights law faces a serious risk of marginalisation if it fails to adapt to this changing reality. Conceptually, the decentralisation of the territorial state necessitates a fundamental re-thinking of a basic tenet of human rights law, i.e. that human rights obligations are primarily if not exclusively incumbent on the territorial state. The proposed Programme intends to address a dual challenge, i.e. to deepen the understanding of human rights obligations of foreign states, and to bring together sub-fields of human rights study, i.e. on the human rights obligations of transnational corporations, international organisations and foreign states.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal service agreement between UA and on the other hand EIUC. UA provides EIUC research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal service agreement between the Chr. Michelsen Institute and on the University Antwerp. The project assesses the integration of children's rights in Swedish and Norwegian development cooperation. Special attention is paid to mainstreaming.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of the Child necessitates the training of professionals in the letter and spirit of the Convention. Universities bear a specific obligation in this regard. The UNICEF Chair in Children's Rights - as a joint initiative of the University of Antwerp and UNICEF Belgium - testifies of the commitment of both to this responsibility. The Chair has its own research programme, and actively stimulates a children's rights component in other research programmes. In its own research programme, emphasis is put on conceptual issues (in particular the mutual reinforcement and enrichment of the children's rights and the general human rights framework), and on economic, social and cultural rights of children. Migration, poverty and child soldiers have been singled out as priority topics for 2010-2012. Particular attention is also paid to children's rights in development and development cooperation. The introduction of a children's rights perspective in other research agendas is sought in particular by organizing expert meetings with scholars in other areas of study.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Since Chinese legal thought has far-reaching impact on Chinese law practice, the main idea of this project is to survey the influence of Chinese legal thought on current Chinese criminal law and to compare with the western standpoint on human rights in the criminal law field. In order to analyze the phenomena and problems between Chinese modern criminal law in practice and Chinese legal thought, I will concentrate on these issues and compare them with the European Convention on Human Rights. Finally, I will conclude on the Chinese human rights situation in the field of criminal law.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Traditional international law is still conceived as inter-state law. States are the main legal subjects in international law. Non-state actors, such as international organisations, companies, non-governmental organisations, armed groups, national liberation movements and even individuals manifest themselves more and more at all levels of international law and policy. The academic research group on the position and role of non-state actors in international law purports to examine what the legal position is of non-state actors in different fields of international law and international relations, and whether that position is desirable from a policy perspective. It will also scrutinize how non-state actors influence the development of international law on the basis of their legal position, and how desirable this influence is. The University of Antwerp will contribute from the perspective of human rights law, and more in particular economic, sociaal and cultural rights.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Despite multilevel attention for the right to education of undocumented children, field practitioners complain about the lack of knowledge on the educational situation of undocumented children and indicate that existing measures are not al-ways adequate. There are no reliable data on the number and characteristics of this group. Moreover, the few studies that have attempted to make estimations fail to inform us on group heterogeneity. As intra-group differences will have a direct impact on the barriers experienced by schools, children and parents, and on the conditions for implementing a more effective policy, it is vital to collect more detailed quantitative data. Further, despite the increasing number of field studies focusing on certain subgroups of undocumented migrants both abroad and in Belgian society, there are few available studies dealing specifically with the topic of educational processes. This project seeks to add on existing knowledge. Target population is restricted to elementary schools for reasons of feasibility and be-cause research shows the determinant effect of cumulated inequalities during primary schooling.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter
• Co-promoter: Mahieu Paul

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project includes the provision of reports and studies on legal issues concerning the promotion and protection of children's rights in the European Union to the Fundamental Rights Agency.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This international, interdisciplinary course seeks to insert a children's rights dimension into global development challenges such as poverty, exploitation, migratino and armed conflict. It departs from a traditional implementation perspective by raising critical questions on the empowerment potential of children's rights under conditions of globalisation.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Children's Rights are human rights. Nonetheless, children's rights and human rights tend to be studied as two separate fields of study. In this research, the mutual enrichment of both fields of study is scrutinized. In particular, it is examined how their respective conceptual frameworks could inform each other, and how both could be integrated into one single framework. Economic, social and cultural rights are focused upon.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The unsatisfactory implementation of socio-economic rights of children in South-Africa raises the question as to how strategically important human rights are in the struggle for improved socio-economic living standards. Particular emphasis will be put on the potential role of paralegals in a human rights-based approach to development, as applicable in Limpopo province.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This research project scrutinizes Belgian asylum law and practice in light of international human and children's rights standards. It focuses on detention and conditions of care with regard to migrant children, and makes recommendations for legislative change.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The evaluation seeks to answer to distinctive questions, i.e. first of all how the Flemish Children's Rights Commissioner's Office has performed its tasks and duties over the past ten years. The second question concerns the current set of tasks itself: should it be maintained as such, and should these tasks be continued as tasks for the Flemish Children's Rights Commissioner.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Vandenhole Wouter

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

L'objectif du mission est d'abord d'examiner la praticabilité du dévelopment d'une coopération structurelle envisagée entre la faculté de droit de l'Université d'Anvers et la faculté de droit de l'Université de Kisangani. Le but et aussi d'établir dans cette première phase des contacts locaux en vue d'un projet de recherche concernant la nouvelle légisation forestière congolaise, l'impact de celle-ci sur les droits des Pygmées qui habitent les forêts en province Orientale et l'influence de la Banque Mondiale dans cette matière.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand the Flemish Public Service. UA provides the Flemish Public Service research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Co-promoter: Cuyvers Ludo
• Co-promoter: Melissen Jan
• Co-promoter: Renard Robrecht
• Co-promoter: Velaers Jan

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: De Feyter Koen
• Fellow: Pacquée Didier

Research team(s)

• Law and Development

Project type(s)

• Research Project