PhD defences in the social sciences
2026
Estrelle Thunnissen - The role of peer relationships in MSM health - 14/01/2026
This research investigates the role of peer relationships in promoting mental and sexual health among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM), a population disproportionately affected by stigma, minority stress, and social isolation. Drawing on mixed-methods research, it demonstrates that strong peer relationships provide emotional support and intimacy, reduce loneliness, and foster social norms that encourage HIV prevention practices.
The study examines the impact of pandemic-related shifts from in-person to remote communication on social support and loneliness, the impact of physical distancing on experiences of intimacy, and explores how social norms at multiple levels shape PrEP uptake. Additionally, it evaluates Web-based Respondent Driven Sampling (WEB RDS) as a method for recruiting hidden populations, identifying challenges such as survey fatigue and digital etiquette norms. Findings underscore the importance of leveraging peer relationships and addressing normative barriers to improve health interventions and health outcomes for MSM.
Practical information
- Promovenda: Estrelle Thunnissen
- Promotors: Prof. dr. Edwin Wouters & prof. dr. Veerle Buffel
- Date: Wednesday 14 January 2026, 2 PM
- Location: Stadscampus, Promotiezaal Klooster van de Grauwzusters (Lange St-Annastraat 7, 2000 Antwerp)
- Language: English
The defence is followed by a reception; please confirm your attendance by January 12 by mailing estrelle.thunnissen@uantwerpen.be.
Jochem Vanagt - Beyond the Two-Party Divide: How Coalition Dynamics and Ideological Orientations Redefine Affective Polarization in Europe - 23/01/2026
|
Cristina Arhiliuc - Classification and characterization of research output from the social sciences and humanities based on textual metadata - 30/01/2026
| ||
|
|
Parbati Phuyal - Ecological and Social Determinants of Dengue and Chikungunya along an Altitudinal Gradient in Central Nepal - 9/2/2026
|
|
|
Anna Willems - Ondersteboven: veranderende zorgperspectieven rond ouder wordende ouders - 10/02/2026
| ||
|
|
Lukas Leitner - Eliciting Preferences for Well-Being Measurement: Methodologigical and Behavioural Challenges - 12/02/2026
|
|
|
PhD defence Simona Kruisinga Bucsea - From Competency Models to Commercial Results. A Mixed-Methods Study of How Sales Managers Align Customer Mind-Set, Competencies, and Relationship to Drive Performance - 23/02/2026
|
|
Floor Doppen - Balancing Security and Economics. The Political Economy of Investment Screening in the EU - 27/02/2026
|
|
|
PhD defence Jan Depauw - It Takes a Village to Map Social Work's Impact. Redefining Impact Evaluation: From Attribution to Contribution — Integrating Context, Mechanisms, and Programme Theory through Co-productive and Reflexive Practice that Interweaves Scientific, Professional, and Experiential Knowledge - 5/3/2026
On Thursday 5 March 2026, Jan Depauw (Department of Sociology) cordially invites you to the public defence of his doctoral thesis
It Takes a Village to Map Social Work's Impact. Redefining Impact Evaluation: From Attribution to Contribution — Integrating Context, Mechanisms, and Programme Theory through Co-productive and Reflexive Practice that Interweaves Scientific, Professional, and Experiential Knowledge
This doctoral thesis responds to the growing demand for impact evaluation in social work, a profession increasingly pressured to demonstrate effectiveness through measurable outcomes. Dominant frameworks, rooted in managerial logics, rely on linear models and standardised indicators. While such models enhance transparency and comparability, they fall short in capturing the complexity, relational dynamics, and contextual embeddedness of social work. This thesis, therefore, advances an evidence-informed, participatory, and reflexive approach that integrates scientific, professional, and experiential knowledge. The thesis makes contributions at three levels. Theoretically, it redefines impact as the social changes—intended and unintended, positive and negative—that emerge in and through social work practices, shaped by context, mechanisms, and relationships. This reconceptualisation shifts the focus from attribution to contribution, from narrow outcome measurement to multidimensional change, and explicitly links evaluation to the core values of social work, including human dignity, social justice, and empowerment. Methodologically, this vision is translated into concrete tools and approaches. The thesis develops and validates three psychometric instruments that render often invisible aspects visible: the Service User Psychological Empowerment Scale (SUPES), co-constructed with social workers and service users, and validated in Belgian Public Centres for Social Welfare; the Buddy Empowerment Scale (BEmS), a multidimensional and participatorily designed tool to assess empowerment in buddy-based social work; the Working Alliance in Mandated Child and Family Interventions Scale (WAMC-I), capturing the quality of professional-client relationships under judicial mandate. Together, these instruments show that empowerment and relational constructs can be measured with psychometric rigour when developed through participatory design. In addition, the study "Not Just Voice" demonstrates how participatory group methods, such as the Méthode d’Analyse en Groupe (MAG), not only reveal mechanisms of change but also strengthen stakeholders during the evaluation process. Epistemologically, the thesis positions social work as a knowledge-producing profession in its own right. By inductively distilling theory from practice and integrating multiple forms of knowledge (scientific, professional, and experiential), it transcends the view of social work as a merely applied field. This orientation culminates in the ACCUMI approach, which articulates six guiding principles for reflexive and participatory impact evaluation. Taken together, the studies demonstrate that impact evaluation in social work cannot be reduced to measuring predefined outcomes. Instead, it is a process of collective knowledge production that supports accountability, fosters organisational learning, and stimulates impact-oriented action. This collective ethos also explains the thesis’s title—It Takes a Village to Map Social Work’s Impact—which highlights that robust, meaningful evaluation depends on the combined contributions of academics, practitioners, and service users alike. By combining psychometric rigour, participatory methodology, and theory-building from practice, this thesis advances an approach to impact evaluation that is scientifically robust, practice-relevant, and empowering.
Practical information
- Promovendus: Jan Depauw
- Promotors: Prof. dr. Peter Raeymaeckers & prof. dr. Kristel Driessens
- Date: Thursday 5 March 2026, 4:00 PM
- Location: Stadscampus, Promotiezaal van de Grauwzusters (Lange St-Annastraat 7, 2000 Antwerp)
- Language: Dutch
The defence is followed by a reception; please confirm your attendance by February 26 by mailing Jan.Depauw@uantwerpen.be.
PhD defence Thalia Van Wichelen - Beyond Rainbow Broadcasting: representation, production and reception of sexual and gender diversity in Flemish children’s media. - 13/05/2026
- Naam: Thalia Van Wichelen
- Promotors: prof. dr. Alexander Dhoest (UAntwerpen) en prof. dr. Sander De Ridder (UAntwerpen)
- Titel van thesis: Beyond Rainbow Broadcasting: representation, production and reception of sexual and gender diversity in Flemish children’s media.
- Datum: Woensdag 13 mei, 17u
- Locatie: Promotiezaal (Klooster van de Grauwzusters), Lange St-Annastraat 7, 2000 Antwerpen
- Taal: Nederlands
Abstract:
Contemporary children’s television has become increasingly diverse, with growing attention to sexual and gender diversity on screen. While the inclusion of LGBTQ characters reflects a broader commitment to diversity in media for young audiences, it unfolds within a landscape marked by ongoing societal debates about what children should know, see, and understand. Recent legislative actions, such as the ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill in the United States or restrictions on so-called ‘gay propaganda’ in parts of Europe, illustrate how expanding representation coexists with intensified contestation around childhood, media, and sexuality. This doctoral dissertation examines how sexual and gender diversity is represented, produced, and received within Flemish children’s fiction through six empirical studies. It combines both qualitative and quantitative methods to capture how different demographic groups (producers, parents, teachers, and children themselves) make sense of these storylines. Focusing on normative ideas about what is considered “appropriate” or “normal” for children, the dissertation shows how LGBTQ characters are often presented in ways that stay close to familiar norms, and how adults draw boundaries around what they consider suitable for young audiences. By bringing these perspectives together, it shows how ideas about childhood and sexuality shape, but also limit, what children are allowed to see.
Fatma Orhan Tahrali - Media Reception and Identity Construction of Turkish Young People in Urban, Rural and Diasporic Contexts (İstanbul, Emirdağ and Brussels) - 18/05/2026
| ||
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Anna Diedkova – Multiple faces of political leaders: ideal president's personality in Russian politics - 20/04/2026
PhD defence Anna Diedkova 20/04/2026
On Monday 20 April 2026, Anna Diedkova (Department of Communication Studies) cordially invites you to the public defence of her doctoral thesis
Multiple faces of political leaders: ideal president's personality in Russian politics
This project investigates personality qualities ascribed to the concept of an ideal political leader in Russia. We examine how politicians communicate about their personality and how citizens view the ideal president’s personality. This dissertation in the interdisciplinary field of political psychology addresses the gap between personality psychology and political communication by applying clinical theories to the study of impression management and voters' expectations. In addition, our emphasis lies on the investigation of a prototypical president in a unique environment, namely the authoritarian regime in the Russian Federation.
Firstly, we explore personality as instrumental for political success in Russia. We address this through a personality profiling study of the long-term incumbent Vladimir Putin compared with the opposition leader Alexei Navalny. The findings show that both politicians share a set of characteristics linked to political success. Yet, Navalny’s non-conforming profile becomes a liability under authoritarian repression, while Putin’s personality aligns with a system focused on control and stability.
Next, we examine how politicians communicate about their personality. We study which personality attributes presidential candidates highlight in their campaign messages. For this, we analyze media messages during presidential election campaigns in Russia (qualitative analysis) and in the U.S. (mixed methods). Analysis of Russian campaign communication reveals that candidates construct their personality by emphasizing strength, ambition, expertise, integrity, empathy, and loyalty. In U.S. campaigns, competence is universally prioritized, while emphasis on other traits varies across ideology, gender, and media format. Finally, we take the perspective of the public and investigate which personality qualities Russians consider relevant for holding presidential office. To address this objective, we combine qualitative and quantitative approaches through a series of in-depth (20) and structured (450) interviews. As a result, we not only catalogue the attributes voters find important but also map how they reason to arrive at their vision of an ideal political leader.
This dissertation demonstrates the utility of formal clinical and trait-based approaches for studying personality and self-presentation in politics. The research provides insight into the reasoning behind voter expectations. Finally, it further extends leadership research into non-democratic settings, examining how an authoritarian regime can utilize personality attributes to convey legitimacy and maintain stability.
Practical information
- Promovenda: Anna Diedkova
- Promotors: Prof. dr. Christ'l De Landtsheer & prof. dr. Philippe De Vries
- Date: Monday 20 April 2026, 4:30 PM
- Location: Stadscampus, Promotiezaal Klooster van de Grauwzusters, Lange St-Annastraat 7, 2000 Antwerpen
- Language: English
The defence is followed by a reception; please confirm your attendance by April 12 by e-mail (anna.diedkova@uantwerpen.be).